Message from @SamanthaFluff
Discord ID: 593211156844249129
@Human Sheeple not based on any pattern
it's time stepping the n-body equations, using newtonian physics
i take 75g of creatine everyday
@SamanthaFluff the pattern of occurances doesn't tell you the ground track of the shadow
and the pattern doesn't work for the whole earth
You know JPL used to be Jack Parson's Laboratory and he used to hang aroudn with Crowley doing satanic orgies with cartoonist Disney, Nazi war criminal Von Braunn. You know Jack Parsons even gave missile technology to racist apartheid state Israel.
@Human Sheeple yet you cite nasa when they say they use the saros cycle to predict eclipses
@Meeper the ground tracks have a pattern to them lol
@Human Sheeple prove that image isn't a painting anyways
No I cited NASA admitting Earth is flat and non rotating
@SamanthaFluff ok show me what pattern predicts this
Plus the ground tracks listed by NASA aren't necessarily reflective of what happens in reality
@SamanthaFluff gonna have to back up that last statement
If NASA tells you the eclipse happens in this specific area, how do you verify it's not happening outside of that claimed area
b/c thats patently false
records of eclipses, same ones you talk about
agree with this method perfectly
@Meeper for starters, they are all plotted with globe earth being assumed as a given :P
Court: You are charged with murder how do you pleasd?
You: Guilty:
Court: Sentencing will occur tomorrow
You: But we've got JPL data to prove I didn't kill anybody.
Court: So why plead guilty then?
🤣
that's how they're accurate
b/c the earth is a globe
no flat earth assumption has this accuracy
lets see it if it exists
Haha. The nature is just not as strict and well behaved as you'd like it to be
@SamanthaFluff proof?
Works perfectly does it?
that sounds like a baseless claim
So why are all the astronomers baffled?
@Human Sheeple Lol nice deflection
can't deal with the fact that solar eclipse ground tracks are perfectly predicted by nasa, using gravity
that must suck
Well it obviously doesn't work perfectly does it
@Meeper you tried to actually make any predictions with 'science' and verify them afterwards? Did you notice that the more you go away from trivial stuff, the more prediction diverges from reality?
No they were perfectly predicted by the Saros Cycle 5,000 years ago