A model of reality

My friend is an astronaut

Wheers the harness?

I don't see it

I see them in microgravity

yes the wires go vertically

that's why they never cross over him with the rings

so the water they play with has strings on it too

and every piece of paper

why is every thing you have a compressed gif

try some actual footage

instead of compression artifacts

become an astronaut

or build yourself a rocket

what about this, is this wires : https://www.gozerog.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Photos_and_Videos.welcome&albumid=5140F6E9-1372-5743-E921F2FC6BFB2500&typeid=D717C203-1372-5743-E98841098DE889C9&media=5&page=1#items

oof then you gotta explain this one :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZ9wVqX23kY

@The Best simarlian LOL

@SamanthaFluff care to explain how solar eclipses are perfectly predicted by the globe model?

oh ya sure

but i showed you this before

how did you forget

oh i can

wanna see?

I think you'll forget though instantly

@SamanthaFluff https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsearch/SEsearch.php

ya but this prediction method does it perfectly

and explains why the pattern exists

how is it accurate if it's based on incorrect information

@SamanthaFluff ya, that's not done

none of what you said is done

ephemerides are generated using gravity spherical earth, heliocentric model

and they predict the ground track perfectly

@MCToon flatties never heard of simplifying assumptions

@SamanthaFluff check recent ground track of US 2017 eclipse

I was there, right on centerline, and the duration matched prediction perfectly

had an app on the phone

@Human Sheeple prove it, b/c this says differently : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_Propulsion_Laboratory_Development_Ephemeris

@MCToon awesome, what type of engineer are you?

@Human Sheeple not based on any pattern

it's time stepping the n-body equations, using newtonian physics

@SamanthaFluff the pattern of occurances doesn't tell you the ground track of the shadow

and the pattern doesn't work for the whole earth

@Human Sheeple yet you cite nasa when they say they use the saros cycle to predict eclipses

@Human Sheeple prove that image isn't a painting anyways

@SamanthaFluff ok show me what pattern predicts this

@SamanthaFluff gonna have to back up that last statement

b/c thats patently false

records of eclipses, same ones you talk about

agree with this method perfectly

that's how they're accurate

b/c the earth is a globe

no flat earth assumption has this accuracy

lets see it if it exists

@SamanthaFluff proof?

that sounds like a baseless claim

@Human Sheeple Lol nice deflection

can't deal with the fact that solar eclipse ground tracks are perfectly predicted by nasa, using gravity

that must suck

sure does

ground track was right on

@SamanthaFluff yes

i used the ephemerides that predicted the last solar eclipse

and it was right one

flat earth does none of this

@Human Sheeple wrong

di dyou forget how i proved you wrong on that already?

@SamanthaFluff so if i can measure distance with a ruler, and a laser, does that mean all distances are measured with a ruler?

@SamanthaFluff yet flat earth can do no such prediction

interesting

@SamanthaFluff it does

it gives you the accurate ground track

previous methods didn't do that

nor did they account for terrain

lol no

thats call measurement uncertainty

wrong , it does match reality

but measurements are imperfect, can you measure somethign with a ruler to 1 millionth of an inch?

hilarious

no flat earth model is even close to this

@SamanthaFluff this proves all of you wrong

@Human Sheeple lets see yoru model of light curving up in air

you claiming that light curves up in air is a model

how much does it curve up?

what does it depend on?

@SamanthaFluff makes sense that you dont' care about what's accurate

@Human Sheeple lol

is that a painting?

how much does it curve up/

@Human Sheeple useless, u got rekt

ok well let's see the equations

"depends on weather conditions" is a model

although you haven't made a good one at all

hahaha no

that's not what that says

oh sure here it is

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19680002127&qs=Ns%3DPublication-Date%7c0%26N%3D4294828771

since you like nasa papers, why do you never cite this one

@SamanthaFluff got anything to back that up?