Message from @SamanthaFluff

Discord ID: 593211845125472278


2019-06-25 22:49:19 UTC  

Court: You are charged with murder how do you pleasd?
You: Guilty:
Court: Sentencing will occur tomorrow
You: But we've got JPL data to prove I didn't kill anybody.
Court: So why plead guilty then?

2019-06-25 22:49:21 UTC  

So that's one big nail in the coffin for the data already

2019-06-25 22:49:25 UTC  

🤣

2019-06-25 22:49:40 UTC  

that's how they're accurate

2019-06-25 22:49:42 UTC  

b/c the earth is a globe

2019-06-25 22:49:56 UTC  

no flat earth assumption has this accuracy

2019-06-25 22:50:01 UTC  

lets see it if it exists

2019-06-25 22:50:44 UTC  

Haha. The nature is just not as strict and well behaved as you'd like it to be

2019-06-25 22:50:53 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:50:57 UTC  

Works perfectly does it?

2019-06-25 22:50:58 UTC  

that sounds like a baseless claim

2019-06-25 22:51:02 UTC  

So why are all the astronomers baffled?

2019-06-25 22:51:30 UTC  

@Human Sheeple Lol nice deflection

2019-06-25 22:51:41 UTC  

can't deal with the fact that solar eclipse ground tracks are perfectly predicted by nasa, using gravity

2019-06-25 22:51:44 UTC  

that must suck

2019-06-25 22:51:46 UTC  

Well it obviously doesn't work perfectly does it

2019-06-25 22:52:05 UTC  

@Meeper you tried to actually make any predictions with 'science' and verify them afterwards? Did you notice that the more you go away from trivial stuff, the more prediction diverges from reality?

2019-06-25 22:52:05 UTC  

No they were perfectly predicted by the Saros Cycle 5,000 years ago

2019-06-25 22:52:06 UTC  

sure does

2019-06-25 22:52:08 UTC  

ground track was right on

2019-06-25 22:52:18 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:52:25 UTC  

And as I've already stated Epherimedes uses ground observation data

2019-06-25 22:52:29 UTC  

i used the ephemerides that predicted the last solar eclipse

2019-06-25 22:52:33 UTC  

and it was right one

2019-06-25 22:52:35 UTC  

So it's pattern recognition, not heliocentric modelling

2019-06-25 22:52:39 UTC  

flat earth does none of this

2019-06-25 22:52:43 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:52:44 UTC  

Sure, maybe your method works, but there have been methods that worked just fine in the past and you can build all sorts of intricate models that all give you same-ish result in the end

2019-06-25 22:52:48 UTC  

di dyou forget how i proved you wrong on that already?

2019-06-25 22:53:07 UTC  

@SamanthaFluff so if i can measure distance with a ruler, and a laser, does that mean all distances are measured with a ruler?

2019-06-25 22:53:21 UTC  

@SamanthaFluff yet flat earth can do no such prediction

2019-06-25 22:53:23 UTC  

interesting

2019-06-25 22:53:25 UTC  

Basically, why build some very complicated tool/model if it doesn't give any major benefits with the different models of the past

2019-06-25 22:53:32 UTC  
2019-06-25 22:53:38 UTC  

it gives you the accurate ground track

2019-06-25 22:53:40 UTC  

previous methods didn't do that

2019-06-25 22:53:45 UTC  

nor did they account for terrain