Message from @SamanthaFluff
Discord ID: 593211845125472278
Court: You are charged with murder how do you pleasd?
You: Guilty:
Court: Sentencing will occur tomorrow
You: But we've got JPL data to prove I didn't kill anybody.
Court: So why plead guilty then?
So that's one big nail in the coffin for the data already
🤣
that's how they're accurate
b/c the earth is a globe
no flat earth assumption has this accuracy
lets see it if it exists
Haha. The nature is just not as strict and well behaved as you'd like it to be
@SamanthaFluff proof?
Works perfectly does it?
that sounds like a baseless claim
So why are all the astronomers baffled?
@Human Sheeple Lol nice deflection
can't deal with the fact that solar eclipse ground tracks are perfectly predicted by nasa, using gravity
that must suck
Well it obviously doesn't work perfectly does it
@Meeper you tried to actually make any predictions with 'science' and verify them afterwards? Did you notice that the more you go away from trivial stuff, the more prediction diverges from reality?
No they were perfectly predicted by the Saros Cycle 5,000 years ago
sure does
ground track was right on
@SamanthaFluff yes
And as I've already stated Epherimedes uses ground observation data
i used the ephemerides that predicted the last solar eclipse
and it was right one
So it's pattern recognition, not heliocentric modelling
flat earth does none of this
@Human Sheeple wrong
Sure, maybe your method works, but there have been methods that worked just fine in the past and you can build all sorts of intricate models that all give you same-ish result in the end
di dyou forget how i proved you wrong on that already?
@SamanthaFluff so if i can measure distance with a ruler, and a laser, does that mean all distances are measured with a ruler?
@SamanthaFluff yet flat earth can do no such prediction
interesting
Basically, why build some very complicated tool/model if it doesn't give any major benefits with the different models of the past
@SamanthaFluff it does
it gives you the accurate ground track
previous methods didn't do that
nor did they account for terrain