Stop muting

Check DM @big ugly

Nibba trying to speak

idk if i agree with this because, if i'm on a skateboard and throw a bowling ball, i know it will push me

Let me speak

I have proof

When he spams gifs just ignore because he always does that (using the same gifs every time). When you explain the misconception or error they usually get angry at u

Plzzzx

and i've actually seen outright scammers on youtube fake videos and claim to show how reaction force doesn't work

I have evidence

Just letting you know now, no point in debating a flat earther lol

that's not really true

Veryyyy true

The Solar System formed from a dust cloud that was at least partially the remnant of one or more supernovas that created heavy elements by nucleosynthesis. Grains of matter accreted through electrostatic interaction. As they grew in mass, gravity took over in gathering yet more mass, releasing the potential energy of their collisions and in-falling as heat. The protoplanetary disk also had a greater proportion of radioactive elements than the Earth today because, over time, those elements decayed. Their decay heated the early Earth even further, and continue to contribute to Earth's internal heat budget. The early Earth was thus mostly liquid.

A sphere is the only stable shape for a non-rotating, gravitationally self-attracting liquid. The outward acceleration caused by the Earth's rotation is greater at the equator than at the poles (where is it zero), so the sphere gets deformed into an ellipsoid, which represents the shape having the lowest potential energy for a rotating, fluid body. This ellipsoid is slightly fatter around the equator than a perfect sphere would be. Earth's shape is also slightly lumpy because it is composed of different materials of different densities that exert slightly different amounts of gravitational force per volume.

The liquidity of a hot, newly formed planet allows heavier elements to sink down to the middle and forces lighter elements closer to the surface, a process known as planetary differentiation. This event is known as the iron catastrophe; the most abundant heavier elements were iron and nickel, which now form the Earth's core.

idk who you were talking about even but people are people,

https://www.google.com/search?q=tubgirl&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6s4Ohh6HjAhVIQhUIHXgNBmoQ_AUIECgB&biw=1570&bih=621#imgrc=M4cYJLsZxBtVoM

flat earther or glober

like both sides have bad arguments

The Earth is round

@Mekki oki but believing in gravity

https://www.google.com/search?q=tubgirl&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6s4Ohh6HjAhVIQhUIHXgNBmoQ_AUIECgB&biw=1570&bih=621#imgrc=M4cYJLsZxBtVoM

Usually when I debate them, it always ends in “show me gravity!” (Which they know is an unreasonable request considered I don’t have a big a** planet), or they just chant “propaganda!” or “fake news”

@thing true it's "unreasonable" and we might know it... but it's still hella important

without proof of gravity, a proof that *relies on gravity* doesn't work

Just because you can’t see a force with your own two eyes doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist

@thing also true but it doesn't mean it does either

Don’t give unreasonable requests like experimenting with supermassive objects to show gravity, that’s all I ask of you flat earthers. Just as I wouldn’t ask you to go to the edge of the “ice wall” and take a pic

fine, but then don't give proofs of curvature that rely on believing in gravity omnes

Exactly

@thing When for hundreds of years you can not prove something it is insane to keep believing it is true.

I’ve told you countless times that it has been though mate

But you won’t believe me

And you won’t take 5 sec on google

i thought you were agreeing that it's "unreasonable" to be able to demonstrate it