Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 597153091816783907
Just letting you know now, no point in debating a flat earther lol
that's not really true
Veryyyy true
The Solar System formed from a dust cloud that was at least partially the remnant of one or more supernovas that created heavy elements by nucleosynthesis. Grains of matter accreted through electrostatic interaction. As they grew in mass, gravity took over in gathering yet more mass, releasing the potential energy of their collisions and in-falling as heat. The protoplanetary disk also had a greater proportion of radioactive elements than the Earth today because, over time, those elements decayed. Their decay heated the early Earth even further, and continue to contribute to Earth's internal heat budget. The early Earth was thus mostly liquid.
A sphere is the only stable shape for a non-rotating, gravitationally self-attracting liquid. The outward acceleration caused by the Earth's rotation is greater at the equator than at the poles (where is it zero), so the sphere gets deformed into an ellipsoid, which represents the shape having the lowest potential energy for a rotating, fluid body. This ellipsoid is slightly fatter around the equator than a perfect sphere would be. Earth's shape is also slightly lumpy because it is composed of different materials of different densities that exert slightly different amounts of gravitational force per volume.
The liquidity of a hot, newly formed planet allows heavier elements to sink down to the middle and forces lighter elements closer to the surface, a process known as planetary differentiation. This event is known as the iron catastrophe; the most abundant heavier elements were iron and nickel, which now form the Earth's core.
idk who you were talking about even but people are people,
flat earther or glober
like both sides have bad arguments
The Earth is round
Usually when I debate them, it always ends in âshow me gravity!â (Which they know is an unreasonable request considered I donât have a big a** planet), or they just chant âpropaganda!â or âfake newsâ
@thing true it's "unreasonable" and we might know it... but it's still hella important
without proof of gravity, a proof that *relies on gravity* doesn't work
Just because you canât see a force with your own two eyes doesnât mean it doesnât exist
Donât give unreasonable requests like experimenting with supermassive objects to show gravity, thatâs all I ask of you flat earthers. Just as I wouldnât ask you to go to the edge of the âice wallâ and take a pic
fine, but then don't give proofs of curvature that rely on believing in gravity omnes
Exactly
@thing When for hundreds of years you can not prove something it is insane to keep believing it is true.
Iâve told you countless times that it has been though mate
But you wonât believe me
And you wonât take 5 sec on google
i thought you were agreeing that it's "unreasonable" to be able to demonstrate it
Because you use the Cavendish which has been proven false numerous times.
we all already know how to google and hear what the authorities say
i got muted
BRO WHAT
You ignore the proof it is fake. Go on with it because there is nothing else you can use. Every attempt to prove mass to mass attraction failed.
Cavendish is a well known reputable experiment done by hundreds of college professor in basic level physics courses man
I WAS LITERALLY THE ONLY PERSON SILENT WHEN U WERE TALKING
not big ugly
hundreds of college professors also say the earth is a sphere. doesn't convince me i guess
Hmmmmmm. I wonder why