Message from @Wood-Ape - OK/MN

Discord ID: 550852486911754260


2019-03-01 01:27:48 UTC  

I would be pro-Union if they weren't pro-ghey

2019-03-01 01:28:02 UTC  
2019-03-01 01:28:13 UTC  

I think we’re seeing the parties start to switch

2019-03-01 01:28:14 UTC  

1861 Democrats?

2019-03-01 01:28:45 UTC  

We need to be a right wing DSA the populist youth who don’t fall victim to Marxist idealism

2019-03-01 01:28:46 UTC  
2019-03-01 01:29:07 UTC  

Republicans being pro-labor is a good step in winning working class/urban Whites (non self hating liberals)

2019-03-01 01:29:14 UTC  

Yep

2019-03-01 01:29:33 UTC  

Republicans becoming a labor party of sorts is a strong direction

2019-03-01 01:29:36 UTC  

@ThisIsChris, no, sir, the burden of proof is on you to display some evidence that demography isn't destiny, and that America is somehow going to be different than Haiti, Rhodesia and SA

2019-03-01 01:29:42 UTC  

"Right-Wing DSA". As in not socialist, but pro-labor.

2019-03-01 01:29:48 UTC  
2019-03-01 01:29:57 UTC  

@StormySeaShore DSSA (Democratic Spenglerian Socialists of America?) 😏

2019-03-01 01:30:01 UTC  

Well I said what I said

2019-03-01 01:30:09 UTC  

@Bjorn - MD lmao epic

2019-03-01 01:30:15 UTC  

If demography doesn't matter , why should IE protest immigration?

2019-03-01 01:30:19 UTC  

EWA (European Workers of America)

2019-03-01 01:30:24 UTC  

Lmao no

2019-03-01 01:30:40 UTC  

American nationalists is fine

2019-03-01 01:30:40 UTC  

What No NE Fireside ?

2019-03-01 01:31:07 UTC  

And you're conveniently omitting hostile foreign actors that subverted the 90% white America and sold policy changes under falsehood.

2019-03-01 01:31:13 UTC  

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN you're not even replying to what I said. But our destiny is obviously not controlled purely by numbers. Proof: Jews (2% of the US) rule. Other proof: 90% white US didn't stop us getting where we are now.

2019-03-01 01:31:28 UTC  

Because they were lied to

2019-03-01 01:31:38 UTC  

I did reply to what you said.

2019-03-01 01:31:45 UTC  

cause we never addressed the JQ during the 1920s and 30s

2019-03-01 01:31:46 UTC  

Can youn hear me ?

2019-03-01 01:31:55 UTC  

Specifically what did I say that you replied to, for real

2019-03-01 01:31:58 UTC  

Thats a NYC accent

2019-03-01 01:32:05 UTC  

Whites don't jave Jew money and never will

2019-03-01 01:32:19 UTC  

I replied to your posts.

2019-03-01 01:32:20 UTC  

Yes I do

2019-03-01 01:32:20 UTC  

In the 1920s we managed to halt most immigration, but we didn't deal with the source of the problem.

2019-03-01 01:32:32 UTC  

It said no Input ?

2019-03-01 01:32:44 UTC  

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN you really didn't reply to anything I said

2019-03-01 01:32:48 UTC  

quote it

2019-03-01 01:32:48 UTC  

Thus it resurfaced.

2019-03-01 01:33:28 UTC  

Hello

2019-03-01 01:33:46 UTC  

"a better world for white people has nothing to do with how white the country is. Think how nice the world is for Jews, a tiny minority. And 90-100% white countries got us where we are today."

2019-03-01 01:33:52 UTC  

I largely agree with @ThisIsChris, but I think it's also worth mentioning that the 2% were able to make use of tactics, strategies, institutions, and narratives that, for a variety of reasons, won't be available to us, so they're a rough model at best.

2019-03-01 01:33:53 UTC  

Make hockey the sport of IE and start up youth hockey leagues in poor white areas as fronts for IE outreach.

2019-03-01 01:34:06 UTC  

Absolutely absurd