Message from @StormySeaShore

Discord ID: 550852374441361408


2019-03-01 01:27:41 UTC  

They openly donate to the Democrat party in most/all cases

2019-03-01 01:27:45 UTC  

@Nico The Great - CA well it makes sense the democrats weren’t always what they are now. The democrats used to be the supporters of American labor. We just need the republicans to take that mantle

2019-03-01 01:27:48 UTC  

I would be pro-Union if they weren't pro-ghey

2019-03-01 01:28:02 UTC  
2019-03-01 01:28:13 UTC  

I think we’re seeing the parties start to switch

2019-03-01 01:28:14 UTC  

1861 Democrats?

2019-03-01 01:28:45 UTC  

We need to be a right wing DSA the populist youth who don’t fall victim to Marxist idealism

2019-03-01 01:28:46 UTC  
2019-03-01 01:29:07 UTC  

Republicans being pro-labor is a good step in winning working class/urban Whites (non self hating liberals)

2019-03-01 01:29:14 UTC  

Yep

2019-03-01 01:29:33 UTC  

Republicans becoming a labor party of sorts is a strong direction

2019-03-01 01:29:36 UTC  

@ThisIsChris, no, sir, the burden of proof is on you to display some evidence that demography isn't destiny, and that America is somehow going to be different than Haiti, Rhodesia and SA

2019-03-01 01:29:42 UTC  

"Right-Wing DSA". As in not socialist, but pro-labor.

2019-03-01 01:29:48 UTC  
2019-03-01 01:29:57 UTC  

@StormySeaShore DSSA (Democratic Spenglerian Socialists of America?) 😏

2019-03-01 01:30:01 UTC  

Well I said what I said

2019-03-01 01:30:09 UTC  

@Bjorn - MD lmao epic

2019-03-01 01:30:15 UTC  

If demography doesn't matter , why should IE protest immigration?

2019-03-01 01:30:19 UTC  

EWA (European Workers of America)

2019-03-01 01:30:24 UTC  

Lmao no

2019-03-01 01:30:40 UTC  

American nationalists is fine

2019-03-01 01:30:40 UTC  

What No NE Fireside ?

2019-03-01 01:31:07 UTC  

And you're conveniently omitting hostile foreign actors that subverted the 90% white America and sold policy changes under falsehood.

2019-03-01 01:31:13 UTC  

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN you're not even replying to what I said. But our destiny is obviously not controlled purely by numbers. Proof: Jews (2% of the US) rule. Other proof: 90% white US didn't stop us getting where we are now.

2019-03-01 01:31:28 UTC  

Because they were lied to

2019-03-01 01:31:38 UTC  

I did reply to what you said.

2019-03-01 01:31:45 UTC  

cause we never addressed the JQ during the 1920s and 30s

2019-03-01 01:31:46 UTC  

Can youn hear me ?

2019-03-01 01:31:55 UTC  

Specifically what did I say that you replied to, for real

2019-03-01 01:31:58 UTC  

Thats a NYC accent

2019-03-01 01:32:05 UTC  

Whites don't jave Jew money and never will

2019-03-01 01:32:19 UTC  

I replied to your posts.

2019-03-01 01:32:20 UTC  

Yes I do

2019-03-01 01:32:20 UTC  

In the 1920s we managed to halt most immigration, but we didn't deal with the source of the problem.

2019-03-01 01:32:32 UTC  

It said no Input ?

2019-03-01 01:32:44 UTC  

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN you really didn't reply to anything I said

2019-03-01 01:32:48 UTC  

quote it

2019-03-01 01:32:48 UTC  

Thus it resurfaced.

2019-03-01 01:33:28 UTC  

Hello

2019-03-01 01:33:46 UTC  

"a better world for white people has nothing to do with how white the country is. Think how nice the world is for Jews, a tiny minority. And 90-100% white countries got us where we are today."

2019-03-01 01:33:52 UTC  

I largely agree with @ThisIsChris, but I think it's also worth mentioning that the 2% were able to make use of tactics, strategies, institutions, and narratives that, for a variety of reasons, won't be available to us, so they're a rough model at best.