Message from @Wretch
Discord ID: 635817197528154123
@Wretch, it's one heck of a logical summersault to suggest two events occurring in the same year indicates one must have caused the other. With that logic, you could just as easily suggest the empire state building (finished construction in 1931) causes autism
Thanks for deleting that mee6 😦 I'll try again
mercury toxicity only looks similar to autism if you ignore the rates of clinical findings and treat common findings and rare findings the same. Mercury toxicity can't be the same thing as autism if the characteristic signs of mercury toxicity are only seen rarely in autism.
for example, a characteristic clinical finding of mercury toxicity is ataxia (clumsy gait) while the main motor finding of autism is repetitive movements. Clumsiness to the extent of being considered pathological is rarely seen in ASD. In other words, typical signs of autism are not the same as typical signs of mercury toxicity
which I think you'll agree, is a more accurate way of looking at it than acting like prevalence isn't important
So there was a study made by anti vaxxers and you want to know what happend, it showed there is NO link between vaccines and autism
better yet watch a documentary on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQKglol4OLE
You said "autism and mercury poisoning are the same thing" and the part of the propoganda film you referenced says "[thimerosal] explains the exact symptoms [autistic children] have". I simply demonstrated how both these statements are meanignless at best. If you really think they are the same thing, please explain further than insulting my intelligence
unless you're offended that I disagree with your logic regarding the 1931 thing in which case I can only say sorry
Hey man, if you do use the mortality rate of certain diseases to make your argument, please take a look at the infection rate too.
lmfao you have done no such thing. also the fact that it was not a thing till the very year it was introduced into the vaccines is a direct correlation whether you like it or not and the fact that it went from 1 and 10000 to 1 in 500 from 1989-1992 because the mercury intake went up double
obviously you did not watch the documentary
funny how it was 1 in 10000 starting in 1930s hmmmm never before recorded wonder why. plus the type they use in vaccines is more deadly to ppl and males in specific
because it was labled as mercury poisoning before CAUSE THAT IS WHAT IT WAS
had to come up with a new condition to cover up their cheap way of preserving the vaccines shelf life
I did watch the documentary a while ago (unfortunately for both of us). My favourite part was around 30 minutes where they try and scare you by saying vaccines have levels of thimerosal in excess of epa guideline then go 'oh yeah btw we used the wrong guidelines there. they have nothing to do with thimerosal or vaccines' (I'm paraphrasing)
regardless, sure there's a loose correlation. Of course, alone this doesn't prove you model but one great way to check a model is to see if can make accurate predictions. With your model, you ought to predict a sharp drop in incidence of autism if thimerosal-containing vaccines aren't given to infants anymore, right? Unfortunately you model fails here because, as you know, autism incidence hasn't dropped. Not only does your model fail this basic test but the correlation that provides the only support for it also vanishes
lol and you comment shows your lack of knowledge it is still in vaccines today
has not been removed
still waiting on your answer on how long it was???/
well?
shouldnt be a hard question to answer
i mean you watched it right?
lol I guess I'm just confused what you think this proves ???
hahahahaha see
You've posted it countless times above. If I were lying, I could scroll up and just look
you're a liar is what you cant even answer how long it was
you did not watch it
if I'm telling the truth it's unlikely i'd remember the runtime of a film i saw two years ago
is this how you always conduct enquiry? It would answer a lot of questions if so
you could remember what happens at the 30 min mark supposedly but caNT REMEMBER THE RUN TIME HAHAHAHA
I have no words
I was bang on with the 30 min estimate too hey 👌
nope
even if you did all that means is you watched a small part <:smart:484956754489376781>
well, it actually means I watch AT LEAST 30 minutes cf ONLY 30 minutes but okay <:smart:484956754489376781>