had to come up with a new condition to cover up their cheap way of preserving the vaccines shelf life

I did watch the documentary a while ago (unfortunately for both of us). My favourite part was around 30 minutes where they try and scare you by saying vaccines have levels of thimerosal in excess of epa guideline then go 'oh yeah btw we used the wrong guidelines there. they have nothing to do with thimerosal or vaccines' (I'm paraphrasing)
regardless, sure there's a loose correlation. Of course, alone this doesn't prove you model but one great way to check a model is to see if can make accurate predictions. With your model, you ought to predict a sharp drop in incidence of autism if thimerosal-containing vaccines aren't given to infants anymore, right? Unfortunately you model fails here because, as you know, autism incidence hasn't dropped. Not only does your model fail this basic test but the correlation that provides the only support for it also vanishes

yea how long is the documentary then?

@Sloan Jask

lol and you comment shows your lack of knowledge it is still in vaccines today

has not been removed

still waiting on your answer on how long it was???/

well?

shouldnt be a hard question to answer

i mean you watched it right?

lol I guess I'm just confused what you think this proves ???

hahahahaha see

You've posted it countless times above. If I were lying, I could scroll up and just look

you're a liar is what you cant even answer how long it was

you did not watch it

if I'm telling the truth it's unlikely i'd remember the runtime of a film i saw two years ago

is this how you always conduct enquiry? It would answer a lot of questions if so

you could remember what happens at the 30 min mark supposedly but caNT REMEMBER THE RUN TIME HAHAHAHA

I have no words

I was bang on with the 30 min estimate too hey 👌

nope

even if you did all that means is you watched a small part <:smart:484956754489376781>

well, it actually means I watch AT LEAST 30 minutes cf ONLY 30 minutes but okay <:smart:484956754489376781>

but anyway, I can understand why you'd want to derail dialogue and it's truly pretty funny but honestly I just care about the science and I can see you're not going to talk about that tonight. I have a quiz in the morning to study for (partly immunology would you believe it) so maybe another time

lol so yea you lied about watching it nice so why should we trust what you claim now seeing as how you have posted nothing to back your claims

and it does not mean you watched 30 minutes hahaha it just means you skipped to the 30 min mark and watched for a few minutes

lol also how am i derailing the topic when you made a claim and i am trying to see if you can even back it up!!! when you make claims you need to back it up in a debate. you have done no such thing so far

you dont even know why males are more likely to get so called autism do you????

and you claimed to watch the documentary lol

still baffles me that we are supposed to believe you watched the documentary and that you remember what is supposed to happen at the 30 min mark but cant give a close estimate on the run time of the documentary

your story has more holes it in than a piece of swiss cheese

You do know that mercury is only dangerous in high doses, its the amount that's toxic, like water for example, water can kill you if you you drink to much since its toxic. its the dosage that kills you.

I vaccinate my children

Hey everyone, **The HighWire with Del Bigtree** just posted a video! Go check it out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4iABeDo5T0

https://tenor.com/view/stephen-colbert-inject-injections-silly-wacky-gif-5837971

I’m vaccinated, rawr I have autism now

lol the person that is diagnosed with autism is sensitive to mercury and that is why they have these reactions

Hello Karens

!mute @🎃Iamfaan🎃