Message from @Sloan Jask
Discord ID: 635669776475226152
Vaccinate your kids
Don’t be stupid
hahahaha funny i would never get it cause i got it naturally and dont need a vaccine to stop me from getting it
besides chicken pox is not shit
what a joke though hahaha even if you have their VACCINE you cn still get it so i guess it was not a vaccination after all was it ???
shows vaccines are ineffective
i suggest you watch the documentary i pinned
they are toxic in the long term since there is no precautions before the injection, we don't have a clue of what they are putting in batches, many nanotech with metal auxiliaries of aluminium and other things along the way .
@Andrewi you see this it seems autism and mercury poisoning are the same thing. therefore autism is not real it is just mercury poisoning
I agree. Austism of Kanner, or Asperger part of the spectrum of austism. Yes likely to be caused by mercury (thiremosal) or alluminium or a mix of this with other nano tech molecules. The nervous system can't get rid of the toxic through the blood circulation /kidneys it's impossible, therefore don't innoculate vaccinations for your children. Can't trust these big pharma, WHO and CDC, GAVI are all part of the death club !
oldest person of the first 11 to ever be diagnosed with autism was born in 1931 the very same year thimerosal was added to vaccines
so autism was not a thing till thimerosal
this along with the cancer genes being injected into kids is all about molding you and your dna how they want you
three websites pharma shills hate:
https://www.askapatient.com/
https://www.peoplespharmacy.com/
http://www.worstpills.org/
@Wretch, it's one heck of a logical summersault to suggest two events occurring in the same year indicates one must have caused the other. With that logic, you could just as easily suggest the empire state building (finished construction in 1931) causes autism
Thanks for deleting that mee6 😦 I'll try again
mercury toxicity only looks similar to autism if you ignore the rates of clinical findings and treat common findings and rare findings the same. Mercury toxicity can't be the same thing as autism if the characteristic signs of mercury toxicity are only seen rarely in autism.
for example, a characteristic clinical finding of mercury toxicity is ataxia (clumsy gait) while the main motor finding of autism is repetitive movements. Clumsiness to the extent of being considered pathological is rarely seen in ASD. In other words, typical signs of autism are not the same as typical signs of mercury toxicity
which I think you'll agree, is a more accurate way of looking at it than acting like prevalence isn't important
So there was a study made by anti vaxxers and you want to know what happend, it showed there is NO link between vaccines and autism
better yet watch a documentary on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQKglol4OLE
You said "autism and mercury poisoning are the same thing" and the part of the propoganda film you referenced says "[thimerosal] explains the exact symptoms [autistic children] have". I simply demonstrated how both these statements are meanignless at best. If you really think they are the same thing, please explain further than insulting my intelligence
unless you're offended that I disagree with your logic regarding the 1931 thing in which case I can only say sorry
Hey man, if you do use the mortality rate of certain diseases to make your argument, please take a look at the infection rate too.
lmfao you have done no such thing. also the fact that it was not a thing till the very year it was introduced into the vaccines is a direct correlation whether you like it or not and the fact that it went from 1 and 10000 to 1 in 500 from 1989-1992 because the mercury intake went up double
obviously you did not watch the documentary
funny how it was 1 in 10000 starting in 1930s hmmmm never before recorded wonder why. plus the type they use in vaccines is more deadly to ppl and males in specific
because it was labled as mercury poisoning before CAUSE THAT IS WHAT IT WAS
had to come up with a new condition to cover up their cheap way of preserving the vaccines shelf life
I did watch the documentary a while ago (unfortunately for both of us). My favourite part was around 30 minutes where they try and scare you by saying vaccines have levels of thimerosal in excess of epa guideline then go 'oh yeah btw we used the wrong guidelines there. they have nothing to do with thimerosal or vaccines' (I'm paraphrasing)
regardless, sure there's a loose correlation. Of course, alone this doesn't prove you model but one great way to check a model is to see if can make accurate predictions. With your model, you ought to predict a sharp drop in incidence of autism if thimerosal-containing vaccines aren't given to infants anymore, right? Unfortunately you model fails here because, as you know, autism incidence hasn't dropped. Not only does your model fail this basic test but the correlation that provides the only support for it also vanishes
yea how long is the documentary then?
lol and you comment shows your lack of knowledge it is still in vaccines today
has not been removed
still waiting on your answer on how long it was???/