that's fine, until the fact that the wells are separated

so it's different portions of atmosphere, each which can refract differently

so the result is still unpredictable

yeah, that link is pretending that the sun's rays are parallel

like, you can see from his diagrams that they aren't

but that, you know, close enough

but ye if we're being honest about the physics

the issue is that the rays will travel through 2 different parts of the atmosphere

so parallel or not, they'll get refracted differently just bc it's 2 separate bits of atmosphere

and that can affect divergence and everything else and put it all out of whack

i.e. in terms of the well, light above one well gets bent at another angle than at the other one. and experiment broken

ye eratosthenes was a good start, but now modern science and technology provide better and more accurate experiments to prove the earth is round

it's because of these points we don't use sticks to prove the earth is round

yeahh that makes sense

but the modern proofs have become so inaccessible

that it's actually possible to question if they're legitimate

butyeah we can agree on the sticks at least

why is it inaccessible

@raspberry ^

@Alexandre like, cavendish is the main one

so, we're supposed to be able to see two iron balls attract

except then nope...gravity's too weak, you have to do it in a restricted setting in a university or govt lab

What about foccault's pendulum

The Earth is not round or flat, it's a cube

@GreenPixel it's an interesting approach but funnily enough i've heard the same thing about that

from globe earthers at least, that it's too small and sensitive to friction to carry out

i feel like things along these lines are worth testing though

Its definitely hard to achieve on one's own, but it is much more publicly accessible and visible that cavendish I think

There are several large ones around the world that are open to visitors

Although there's always the motor argument

it does feel more approachable. for looking for/disproving the earth's rotation i feel like something similar could work

for the public ones that you can't mess with yourself, yeah, i think it's hard to avoid that those could be rigged

@Mone FAKE. Trump did not work with Russia at all. Hillary and Obama did both are Communist so that makes complete sense.

Trump is a Nationalist. Not a Socialist like NAZI is. Obama and Hillary are NAZI's as well. They support Antifa the same group of NAZI's in Germany by the same name translated to English. They lie they are anti fascist when in reality they are the fascist in America.

Wtf

lol

does anyone know why i cant send messages in creation-vs-evolution anymore?

@Citizen Z so? Do you have values that work with your model? Or are you just going to dismiss it?
Do you even know what refraction is? Or are you just throwing buzzwords around?

Whats your values

@Steve Angell nope,National Socialism may have socialism in the name,but when itler and his bois founded it,they put Soialism to go uncercover,Trump did work with Russia because how do yu explain his rasizm,Haaa?.Also Obama is a woman -_-,stop being transpohbic.more proof trump worked with russia

www.trumpisgay.com

Did you not watch the video?