Message from @FatBeat

Discord ID: 630594127460958218


2019-10-07 02:31:22 UTC  

2019-10-07 02:31:27 UTC  

its right in the day lol

2019-10-07 02:31:30 UTC  

Is this server ironic or unironic?

2019-10-07 02:31:34 UTC  

Unironic

2019-10-07 02:31:37 UTC  

K

2019-10-07 02:32:39 UTC  

The explanation for atmospheric refraction 'assumes' a globe, and that's why it works. Try and find me an article that explains this phenomenon assuming a flat plane. I'll make it quick. There are none, because you would get a completely different image and effect from atmospheric refraction on a flat plane.

2019-10-07 02:33:02 UTC  

cmon lmao, that argument is so easily debunked by atmospherc refraction. look, i will make this simple for you. object far away? water in between that object and you? the object will look ALWAYS look lower than where it is

2019-10-07 02:33:35 UTC  

How many actual flat earthers are here?

2019-10-07 02:33:39 UTC  

This is impossible on a flat surface...you do realize that, right?

2019-10-07 02:33:53 UTC  

how come? i've never see water curve

2019-10-07 02:34:06 UTC  

The lighthouse can appear lower than it actually is because the illustration and explanation assume we are on a sphere...a statement that many flat earthers despise.

2019-10-07 02:34:31 UTC  

which is true because of refraction

2019-10-07 02:34:40 UTC  

im not even a flat earther but you're completly ignoring that

2019-10-07 02:34:49 UTC  

god

2019-10-07 02:35:01 UTC  

Okay

2019-10-07 02:35:16 UTC  

So we are essentially arguing over something we already agree on

2019-10-07 02:35:18 UTC  

oh my god

2019-10-07 02:35:30 UTC  

see, that evidence was not substantial give me something that can't be refuted.

2019-10-07 02:35:45 UTC  

you could've said star trails or coriolis effect but nah

2019-10-07 02:35:51 UTC  

We already agree on the same thing...

2019-10-07 02:35:55 UTC  

a dumb argument which is easily debunked

2019-10-07 02:36:09 UTC  

waves curve

2019-10-07 02:36:26 UTC  

the illustration assumes a spherical earth, which is why it makes sense when we look at the image

2019-10-07 02:36:44 UTC  

If it assumed a flat earth, refraction would act differently.

2019-10-07 02:36:53 UTC  

what illustration are you talking about? the one with the light house?

2019-10-07 02:36:58 UTC  

And the result would not match the image

2019-10-07 02:37:15 UTC  

this

2019-10-07 02:37:36 UTC  

I was about to lose it because you started agreeing with me and I had no idea what your stance was anymore

2019-10-07 02:37:42 UTC  

You're kidding right? I just told you that the light house was not a celestial object yet you keep using that illustration?

2019-10-07 02:37:51 UTC  

It literally said on wikipedia

2019-10-07 02:38:05 UTC  

''Astronomical or celestial refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher above the horizon than they actually are. Terrestrial refraction usually causes terrestrial objects to appear higher than they actually are''

2019-10-07 02:39:10 UTC  

I'm not referring to the light house specifically here. I'm referring to the way refraction would affect everything we see.

2019-10-07 02:39:14 UTC  

Gotta head off got work tomorrow I'll try and stop by tomorrow night again @Logrian

2019-10-07 02:39:25 UTC  

I moved on from the light house a while back

2019-10-07 02:39:29 UTC  

@Lee Lushy later 👋

2019-10-07 02:39:36 UTC  

Goodnight all

2019-10-07 02:39:42 UTC  

"if the earth were a ball, the cats would have knocked it beneath the couch by now"

2019-10-07 02:39:43 UTC  

@Lee Lushy kk dude, have fun, be well 🙂

2019-10-07 02:39:45 UTC  

I think I was a bit too vague on that

2019-10-07 02:39:46 UTC  

night lee