Message from @Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids
Discord ID: 630595076237557816
see, that evidence was not substantial give me something that can't be refuted.
you could've said star trails or coriolis effect but nah
We already agree on the same thing...
a dumb argument which is easily debunked
waves curve
the illustration assumes a spherical earth, which is why it makes sense when we look at the image
If it assumed a flat earth, refraction would act differently.
what illustration are you talking about? the one with the light house?
And the result would not match the image
this
I was about to lose it because you started agreeing with me and I had no idea what your stance was anymore
You're kidding right? I just told you that the light house was not a celestial object yet you keep using that illustration?
It literally said on wikipedia
''Astronomical or celestial refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher above the horizon than they actually are. Terrestrial refraction usually causes terrestrial objects to appear higher than they actually are''
I'm not referring to the light house specifically here. I'm referring to the way refraction would affect everything we see.
Gotta head off got work tomorrow I'll try and stop by tomorrow night again @Logrian
I moved on from the light house a while back
@Lee Lushy later 👋
Goodnight all
@Lee Lushy kk dude, have fun, be well 🙂
I think I was a bit too vague on that
night lee
So you agree that the atmospheric refraction can cause the object which is in between water to appear lower than it is?
**Question Of The Day #208**
Is the Greta Thunberg phenomenon nothing but a money-making scheme set up by her handlers to profit from climate hysteria?
Share your thoughts in the <#484514023698726912> 😃
Yes I 100% do. I disagreed with you because I thought you were saying this happened on a flat earth
Funny how that image was taken in the day.
If it was in the night, I wouldn't be able to defend my argument
I wonder why 🤔 they can easily deceive with the arguments
Damn...
You really threw me off there.
I still have a lot of work to do with my debate skills as well as my knowledge on science and flat earth claims, as you can see.
Why were you kicked?
*bans @Abe*
that sucks abe
damn thats on a whole other level
The whole reason why this started is because I thought you were making those claims assuming that the earth was flat @FatBeat
My question is, what exactly were you trying to say?
That the argument was weak?