Message from @FatBeat
Discord ID: 630593771595235378
'' although in the afternoon when the air near the ground is heated, the rays can curve upward making objects appear lower than they actually are '' sea evaporation
thank you lol
That does indeed make sense.
Except it is in favor of my argument...
Thanks for helping me I guess?
? light house is further away making it look lower than it is from the land you are seeing
It could go either way, we don't know the time of day or atmospheric conditions when that video was taken. However, it is irrelevant to my original claim.
Question
its right in the day lol
Is this server ironic or unironic?
Unironic
K
The explanation for atmospheric refraction 'assumes' a globe, and that's why it works. Try and find me an article that explains this phenomenon assuming a flat plane. I'll make it quick. There are none, because you would get a completely different image and effect from atmospheric refraction on a flat plane.
cmon lmao, that argument is so easily debunked by atmospherc refraction. look, i will make this simple for you. object far away? water in between that object and you? the object will look ALWAYS look lower than where it is
How many actual flat earthers are here?
This is impossible on a flat surface...you do realize that, right?
how come? i've never see water curve
The lighthouse can appear lower than it actually is because the illustration and explanation assume we are on a sphere...a statement that many flat earthers despise.
im not even a flat earther but you're completly ignoring that
god
Okay
So we are essentially arguing over something we already agree on
oh my god
see, that evidence was not substantial give me something that can't be refuted.
you could've said star trails or coriolis effect but nah
We already agree on the same thing...
a dumb argument which is easily debunked
waves curve
the illustration assumes a spherical earth, which is why it makes sense when we look at the image
If it assumed a flat earth, refraction would act differently.
what illustration are you talking about? the one with the light house?
And the result would not match the image
this
I was about to lose it because you started agreeing with me and I had no idea what your stance was anymore
You're kidding right? I just told you that the light house was not a celestial object yet you keep using that illustration?
It literally said on wikipedia
''Astronomical or celestial refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher above the horizon than they actually are. Terrestrial refraction usually causes terrestrial objects to appear higher than they actually are''