Message from @StoneCold316

Discord ID: 761564630766059521


2020-10-01 21:18:34 UTC  

==

2020-10-01 21:26:10 UTC  

Expanding on that 13 year old giving the 14 yo boy a BJ when he wasn't fully conscious, what if she got him on the verge of cumming, and objected after the fact because he rammed his dick fully down her throat, leaving her asphyxiated temporarily and so quivering more strongly around his dick and so he grabbed her head and pulled it on more strongly, leaving her later claiming that amounted to rape despite starting from her actions and leading to conditions where she was unable to communicate that and he wouldn't respond until after shooting his load anyway? (and ignoring age of consent laws they both violate in many places)

What if she sucked him until he got hard enough to fuck, and then jumped on him being even hornier herself, but as he became more conscious realized he was compelled to orgasm but shoved his dick up her ass to limit pregnancy risks, and she didn't care for that? (Or what if they were 18 and 19, to remove statutory frauds issues, but retain sleep or implied mutual consent to relaxed personal boundaries aspects of drinking together and then hopping into bed?)

With the age 13/14 conditions, how many places would prosecute the girl for raping the boy?

2020-10-02 04:35:44 UTC  

Your mind goes to sick places just from a simple question that you still didn’t answer

2020-10-02 04:36:15 UTC  

If a 14 year old shot her attempted rapist, was it self defense? Yes or no?

2020-10-02 04:36:50 UTC  

Keep in mind she’s 14 and can’t legally carry a gun.

2020-10-02 05:41:18 UTC  

TRUMP HAS COVID

2020-10-02 06:10:06 UTC  

94.6% survival rate 🤷🏻‍♂️

2020-10-02 09:44:21 UTC  

> TRUMP HAS COVID
@Blue Sailor

> 94.6% survival rate 🤷🏻‍♂️
@Ozymandias


In that case, let's get hypothetical for our own entertainment.

Scenario One: Trump sadly does not survive. What happens next?

2020-10-02 09:47:08 UTC  

> 94.6% survival rate 🤷🏻‍♂️
@Ozymandias

In his age group?


(Presumably he tested positive without symptoms? In which case, odds are good for him.)

2020-10-02 10:19:14 UTC  

This just so shocking. Truly nobody could have seen this coming - I mean, he was so careful at those huge indoor rallies with his thousands of supporters, many of whom reject masks and think the coronavirus is a liberal hoax

2020-10-02 10:24:23 UTC  

Conspiracy theory: Biden gave it to him during the debates in order to knock him out of the election

2020-10-02 10:25:00 UTC  

Conspiracy theory 2: Trump is lying in order to stall the election.

2020-10-02 10:25:05 UTC  

> Your mind goes to sick places just from a simple question that you still didn’t answer
@JPMcGlone
Do you have any clue how much of a halfwit bigoted jerk you are?

Jurisdiction matters, and the whole of the facts matter.

14 year olds in many cases do have lawful access to firearms, at least on certain private property.

If the 14 year old initiated sex with another early teen in a state defining both to be below age of consent, or with someone drunk or sleeping at any age if in an affirmative consent insane laws state like California, everyone involved could claim self defense shooting each other, as could third party shooters claiming to act on behalf of other parties. At the same time it might be arguable that the parties initiating violations forfeited any affirmative defense. Only a nutcase or a liar or an idiot would pretend applicable law can be analyzed out of context.

As a general principle of law, noting both sex and firearms trigger political abuses often at odds with valid law, being in the position of a "clean hands" victim of violent felonies generally offers some claim to a right to use whatever means is available for self defense, just as stealing food or vandalizing property if injured or in a survival situation in the wilderness may not always be criminal, even if so defined in statute.

2020-10-02 10:25:51 UTC  

@ola not bad, but ya gotta dial up the scandal dial 😉

2020-10-02 10:25:52 UTC  

===
It's bad faith trolling to repeatedly prod for answers you've already been told aren't possible with the ungrounded hypotheticals being used to troll.

2020-10-02 12:18:11 UTC  

Loki, my hypothetical isn’t possible? Are you kidding me? @m.miller I’ve been nothing but kind to this man in this back and forth, and he’s called me a half witted jerk, accused me of coming at him in bad faith and lies about the fact that my question is some sort of impossible hypothetical.

Nobody calling for his removal. This is what I’m talking about, M. Laughable.

2020-10-02 12:20:50 UTC  

Hey @ola Trump responded more like a kind human being to the news of RBG’s death than you did to the news of him testing positive for COVID.

But you wouldn’t know that because in your own words: “Out of respect for her, I didn’t listen to his comment.”

The hatred boiling up in the hearts of the left is really sad. I hope he recovers well! And I’m sure he will.

Remember, they are tested ROUTINELY. They likely test positive before any symptoms occur.

2020-10-02 12:21:55 UTC  

@Katelyn he literally never said coronavirus is a liberal hoax. He said much of the news around coronavirus is a hoax, and it is. He said a lot of the news around how he’s dealt with coronavirus is a hoax, and it is.

And you’re just proving his point.

2020-10-02 12:25:57 UTC  

Let’s hope the news around coronavirus is a hoax then. 🤞

2020-10-02 12:33:08 UTC  

> Let’s hope the news around coronavirus is a hoax then. 🤞
@StoneCold316

I live in a very low SARS-Cov-II rate area, but that's still non-zero.

My brother lives in an area a couple hours outside NYC, and says "Everyone knows someone who's died."

A niece far away ended up by a coincidence of circumstances managing an elder care facility that was converted to a Covid ward. That's only marginally safer than direct patient staff she tries to keep healthy.

2020-10-02 12:33:51 UTC  

Trump never said anything like COVID doesn’t exist.

2020-10-02 12:35:33 UTC  

When Trump shut down the borders with China, Democrats were literally saying it was overkill and xenophobic.

It all started there. Then Democrats became the party of “shut it down” MORE than Trump and their tune changed.

2020-10-02 12:35:43 UTC  

This country is so divided

2020-10-02 12:41:29 UTC  

I really hope we don’t find out that his “test positive” is some sort of trick to get him off the campaign trail!

Is it beneath Trump’s enemies to pull that off? The people who are yelling that they’ll “stop at nothing” to make sure he doesn’t win the election?

2020-10-02 12:42:42 UTC  

If, hypothetically, we found that out, and nobody is tried for treason, then we lose this country because there is nothing (short of an assassination) that would be considered treasonous anymore.

But this is hypothetical.

Sadly, I wouldn’t be totally surprised

2020-10-02 12:56:52 UTC  

For the BLM bigots, and microaggression scammers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RovF1zsDoeM

2020-10-02 12:57:37 UTC  

@m.miller more of it.

Careful Loki, they’re gonna ban you and unban you too.

Actually no they won’t, you have the “right views”. Stupid mob lol

2020-10-02 13:23:15 UTC  

> Hey @ola Trump responded more like a kind human being to the news of RBG’s death than you did to the news of him testing positive for COVID.
>
> But you wouldn’t know that because in your own words: “Out of respect for her, I didn’t listen to his comment.”
>
> The hatred boiling up in the hearts of the left is really sad. I hope he recovers well! And I’m sure he will.
>
> Remember, they are tested ROUTINELY. They likely test positive before any symptoms occur.
@JPMcGlone


I'm not required to be polite about him. I wish people would understand that.

Nevertheless, I've been fairly polite. Note the word "sadly" and the consideration I've given to his good chances of being fine.

As for "hatred" and "left" -- irrelevant.

2020-10-02 13:50:25 UTC  

> @Katelyn he literally never said coronavirus is a liberal hoax. He said much of the news around coronavirus is a hoax, and it is. He said a lot of the news around how he’s dealt with coronavirus is a hoax, and it is.
>
> And you’re just proving his point.
@JPMcGlone Sure, you're right that he was saying about the media coverage of it, not coronavirus itself. But the implication was that the media is lying or exaggerating about covid, when they were actually reporting it accurately while he was telling egrious lies downplaying it. This made a lot of his followers not take it seriously, and a considerable chunk of the right wing does (or at least did) believe that the coronavirus was a conspiracy, and he certainly wasn't helping that cause. He has continued to spread misinformation about covid, which has created confusion (especially during the critical early stages). He has created a moronic cultural war about wearing masks, one of the few things on our power to control the spread with extensive evidence for its efficacy even coming from his own administration - he's gone back and forth on masks, but even in that clip of the debate, he's mocking and shaming people for taking precautions when any respectable leader would be encouraging that. He's continued to host large rallies where many of his supporters don't wear masks.

We do need peope to start taking this seriously so that another 100k Americans don't fucking die. Trump supporters are a major source of people flouting mask mandates / social distancing measures and propagating misinformation. I think this is the only thing that *might* change their behavior at this point. I don't wish ill upon him in the sense that I wish we could have achieved people taking it seriously through some other means, but if this is the way it has to be then so be it.

2020-10-02 14:02:23 UTC  
2020-10-02 14:06:19 UTC  

NYT is nothing even approaching a reputable source

2020-10-02 14:14:48 UTC  

> NYT is nothing even approaching a reputable source
@Delta

The Grey Lady sure ain't what she used to be, but their Covid coverage has been pretty good, limited mainly by the issues of medicine on hyperdrive doing research, and political tampering at both some states, and Federal, levels. The Federal tampering is exclusively blood on the hands of one and only one malignant narcissist.

A relative used to work for Dr. Fauci developing ELISA tests years ago, and there seems to be good reason to give his ability to deal with leading edge biomed and the politics of funding a functional agency, a lot of credit.

The truth is incredibly few people have died, compared to older pandemics. That's largely due to antibiotics advancing, and most historic deaths not being viral, but secondary infections in already compromised people.

The way humans have overpopulated the planet and done our best to trash ecosystems, maybe it'd be desirable to see a few billion die off? Same with wars, that fail that herd culling function if one or both sides have key forces in remote air conditioned video game play centers.

2020-10-02 14:25:01 UTC  

> Donald Trump is literally the biggest source of covid misinofrmation: https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/evanega-et-al-coronavirus-misinformation-submitted-07-23-20-1/080839ac0c22bca8/full.pdf
@Katelyn

Says the NYT

Also you do realize that Trump has experts right. Give me one instance when Trump went against Fauci

2020-10-02 14:27:42 UTC  

> @Katelyn
>
> Says the NYT
Says expert researchers at Cornell University.

> Also you do realize that Trump has experts right. Give me one instance when Trump went against Fauci
@JPMcGlone
Here's an instance: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/11/fauci-trump-coronavirus/

2020-10-02 14:35:40 UTC  

@JPMcGlone in the debate with Biden trump literally argued that masks don’t work when multiple studies have shown that they reduce the rate of infection

2020-10-02 14:36:24 UTC  

There have been so many studies and statements made by medical officials that say that if people wore masks then the infection spread rate would decrease drastically

2020-10-02 15:12:40 UTC  

@JPMcGlone I'm just seeing this, give me a little bit to sort it out.

2020-10-02 15:14:28 UTC  

@LokiV calling someone a halfwit bigoted jerk IS an ad hominem. We don't allow those here. I'll be sending you a DM.

2020-10-02 15:22:16 UTC  

@Katelyn that paper is really damning