nope

Everyone gets an AK

guns but too many you get the american paradox too cowardly to use

them on globalists

More guns = less violent crime

Yes. Maybe limit explosives & rpg type weaponry.

nope

But honestly, I only care if I can wear a sword around.

@Mr. Wright no, the point of 2A is to resist the tyranny of the state. We need to be able to be equally as armed a the state.

Yes for guns, only requirement is either going to the military so ergo all young men with mandatory 6 months training/ service or 1 year. Otherwise 3 tier system starting with pistols and short weapons of small caliber, psychological screen, and practicla traiing for combat, Second tier is bolt action and semi auto, shotgins, tactical training as well, third tier is anything military like, long weapons, tactical training as well as military preperation and a final combat exam. each tier gives you access to a certain tier of weapons and trains you in their use, prservation, and in the end makes you combat capable and at least coherent in your use of firearms when in a live fight.

so98+ % men get it off the bat, but women and those who either skip mandatory service or those who cant serve get the chance to be armed but on an equal playing field. Which creates a healthy culture around firearms as well

Unlimited

Yes and yes.

Only unions should have guns.

I think we should make both the right to carry arms that can't be concealed and the right to vote tied to some kind of military training, only those trained in how to use weapons should hold them and determine how the state uses them in war for instance

@Doctor Anon are you catholic or protestant

he is a baptist\

i think

@The American Nationalist Currently Baptist

aslong as your not catholic

I’m a Congregationalist

i'm atheist but hey i'm not catholic

🌪

Atheism is big gay

Unless you're agnostic

i'm agnostic but i'm functionally atheist

deism is the chad religion

Deism isn’t a religion

<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>

i like to think that any sentence using chad as an adjective is supposed to be ironic in some way

deism is a belief that people of other religions can believe in or some shit apparently

False.

nah, deism is light-weight enlightenment drivel

it actually removes the useful parts of religion, and leaves them with what?

it was the 18th century version of atheist

when that was too controversial to say

t. former unironic deist

@Jay1532 You are exactly right!

t. former unironic deist

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should positive rights such as a right to protection by police exist?