yes it is what i'm asking, but won't decentralization make it larger (and therefore have more government expending)?

i don't see how that happens

but think of it this way

@Deleted User

@21tagtmeiern

Touch boobs

decentralized governments are a lot more adaptable, which helps reduce waste and stuff

@21tagtmeiern that’s it

@Deleted User

but for instance, if a state separates in 3 new states, every new state will need all the governing body of a state won't it?

the federal government spends as much title 1 money on rich schools as poor schools

but the governing bodies are smaller

and have less power

btw tf @Deleted User @Deleted User

wut is this

It’s a convention lad

@Deleted User pull out your huge tits

ok, then i guess decentralized is better

@Deleted User triggered AntiSpam, let's not try that again

depends on the country and circumstance.

@Deleted User triggered AntiSpam, let's not try that again

autocephalous style government

Centralized but localized governments should have the power to be able to administrate effectively

that's vague enough to just mean statism

oh and u support borders ig

that response means nothing else @Bagrat

I have a mixed view on the issue

Although I lean towards centralized a government is inherently limited in scope of what it itself can efficiently administrate and hence a larger state can not be fully centralized without suffering major drawbacks and hence it has to be somewhat decentralized to more local authorities to accommodate

oh ok gotcha

Does this sub hate libertarians or something?

there are some natcaps and lolberts here

"Natcaps" ???

Pinochet lovers

Oh... gotcha.

So... neocon sub?

There is a lolbert on the staff, but he's been offline for a while

I dont think any of us are neocons

not even our resident schlomo @otterlycorrect

Strange lingo. But right wing authoritarians?

Hmm.

@Zayan Watchel Many of us are fascists, yes