Answer his question

Have you?

Why the fuck are people voting against a nationalist party. Don't you communists and liberals want to split the fash?

Inb4 communism can be attained through nationalism

Why are you giving them that idea alex

It pretty much has, every time

Lol

He’s a spy

Because nationalist party>fascist party. Fascism is the next best thing.

Maybe

global socialism
vs
***national socialism***

Nationalist is true

@Lotus Calme "Natural Laws" are nothing more than bullshit abstraction that no-one with a philosophically-refined mind can take seriously. You're also never going to be able to "apply" any of the natural sciences to the study of human society and human behavior. Ever. That's just more biologically-reductionist and physicalist bullshit from you, Mr. Roboto. And how did Karl Marx not have a connection to the people? Pretty sure you haven't read a single biography of him. As for your claim that he had a "poor" understanding of economics, you couldn't possibly be more wrong. His critique of the capitalist mode of production is still just as relevant today as it was when he first wrote it, and you won't find a serious economist that believes otherwise, regardless of political affiliation. I think you would also be surprised that much of what he wrote is just now being "discovered" by heterodox economists. Lel

Fascism is just making money because of fascism

Lefists wall

If we lose the strong fascist party though we lose the ideological extremity

Tl;dr?

The dominant party would be looser

>extremity

We can always cooperate

Why be extreme

Because its cooler and higher iq

Also I have said coalition can exist

cause compromise brings failure

Nat-fash coalition when

Maybe you should have gotten a shitty sociology degree you ignorant turd.

Compromise doesnt always bring failure but we already dominate here

Please continue displaying your gross ignorance of both Marx, as well as economics and political theory in general. I will gladly continue wiping the floor with you.

National Fascist Helicopter Bommer-Informer Identity Preservation Force

Smh

If you new economics you would know that supply and demand counteracts mass distribution

@Deleted User
>St. Thomas of Aquinas
Is the only necessary response to your bullshit of philosophy
>The proud sociologist believes in nurture more than nature
Cute, but it won't get you very far.
>not reading about every ideology from their own perspective
I'm not a pleb.
>HiS CRiTIQUe oF tHe CaPiTalIST MoDE Of PROducTioN Is StILL ReleVANt aNd ToTaLLY UNiQue

Marx had a good critique of capitalism, but the wrong solution. Or at least, his solution has been mismanaged constantly

^

!rank

Hello

Tfw Socialists aren’t gunning to help commies

@Lotus Calme Aquinas? Really? That's who you resort to in defense of your position regarding fake and gay "Natural Laws"? That's like theology 101 shit you half-wit. And way to strawman me.. I never stated nor implied that I believed nurture was of more importance than nature. The only person who has posited absolutist bullshit is you, Mr. Apply Hard Science To Social Issues. Fallacious reasoning won't get you far, especially not with someone that knows their shit. And if you actually had even so much as an undergraduate level understanding of Macroeconomics and the history of political economy, you'd know that it definitely is still relevant, as well as "totally unique". You really wanna continue playing this game, scrub?

>must include insult at end to further validate argument

@Fantastic It's just the icing on the cake, baby.