Wait.... all the parties here are Anglo-centric? Damn it. I'm not here to support Atlanticism.

How do you join a party?

Fascism and Communism are dead ideologies, and conservatives are just Atlantacist liberals.

Communism is practically dead, considering China, Vietnam, Laos and Cuba have all liberalized their economies, and to certain extent their politics. Cuba is revising their constitution to take into account of business owners.

@Adoring Fan Fuck off irrelevant skinhead.

Privatization was literally coined to describe Nazi Germany.

It's weird, that.

Maybe this discussion should be moved to general, where it won't be disrupted by propaganda?

Canaanites were before Jews

Where do I choose the party?

I mean, ehh, I'm not a racialist or alt-white crybabyist who whines about how 'superior' Nordic culture is being undermined by the Jews and brown people, especially when you enter the anglosphere.

So what kind of fascism is the fascist party?

How much racialism is in the fascist party?

Ptfu, ptfu. Racialism is a pseudo-scientific scourge.

Ethnic homogeneity in America is a LARPing joke, tbh.

I know, I know.

I was referring to the real world then.

Libertarians are liberal capitalist succ-slaves.

Yes, liberal. Eurasianists define the term differently.

Free market capitalism is trash. Fascism is the closest to Eurasianism, compared to all the other parties.

Yes and no

Fascists

Yes

Patriarchy is the natural state of things, husband and wife (or two) are the natural building blocks of civilization

Gay Swans rape a female swan and steal her egg. I think nature is giving us a clear message.

Humans aren't Bees.

@lysate No shit, sherlock

@lysate Metaphors are only allowed as a joke.

Pinochet was a capitalist shill.

Fascists aren't liberals.

In what sense @Gustavus the Thiccus ? Fascism is third-positionist and an ideology that is practically dead in the face of liberal dominance.

The French can ;^)

Heh. Jason Mason

Nazbols, where?

Did you guys know that in Sinkiang, Soviet forces cooperated and worked with White Russian exiles to fight Turkic rebels and the 36th Division?

The thought of it is pretty cool tbh.

Soviet BT-7's rolling down the hill along with Cossack cavalry.

Actually, different churches do have different beliefs. That's why Anglicanism is basically dead. They can't decide what they believe or not.

Stop

That's a bullshit argument

They actually did, as teachers

What can you expect from a fucking Libertarian.

It's early morning here

Australia

Nice. It's an expensive country though.

Nah, Denmark. Australia is decent

It's really expensive. We spent a whole fucking evening trying to find an affordable restaurant

Blacks made white people

White people were Yakub's greatest mistake

If you can't work in capitalism, without state intervention (which is usually shitty), you can't survive

Yes you are

You're definitely a liberal

It's sad that Liberals have become the objective standard in the post-modern world, even though they're all retarded.

We're all (supposedly) Human. Apart from superficial similarities, the similarities end there.

Neither are libertarians, lol

Thinking bad of them =/= isolating myself from them

Krokodil is the best shit

Communism isn't anarchy. Not state socialism like the USSR anyway

Come on, the Holdomor is mostly falsified bullshit.

It happened, but not to the extent that anti-communists think

Tbf, Rape of Nanjing counts. Japan was expanding primarily to fuel their factories, which is a pretty capitalist reason to expand, tbh

Actually, now I think about it, there could be a financial aspect to Hitler's expansion. He was deep in debt from borrowing to rebuild the armed forces.

Why not pay it off with resources and spoils of war from different countries?

Who knows?

Any Christians here, if so, what denomination?

Eww, that's gommunism

Low-key racism is stupid

Low-key we should work with Muslims and Jews

Change Jew to Zionist and I agree.

A Eurasianist Jew is a good Jew.

Jew who supports Jewish ethno-state in Palestine, typically a supporter of American and Israeli anti-Arab imperialism.

They don't. In fact, right-wing Zionist media constantly laments how many Western Jews are disgusting atheist commies who hate Glorious Israel.

They can't play the anti-semitism card (although they do that sometimes) to Jews, so they use the commie card.

@Chronik That loses its impact if you're a natsoc

Eww no

Oh. Oh yes

@Chronik What fash are you?

Lame.

Not actually a fash. I'm fourth positionist, a Eurasianist.

I'm not joking. Eurasianism is a lot more complex than establishing a Eurasian state. That's a facet, the desired goal, but ultimately it's about creating a Eurasian (geographical term) alliance of conservative land-based nations against the liberal west.

You're a liberal?

No, and the point isn't to include every Eurasian nation, but major ones such as Russia, Tehran, China, Germany and France. Nah, Eurasianism is about preserving cultures from liberal destruction.

1. West being replaced by fascism is laughable, fascism, especially anglo-fascism is dead. Secondly, supra-national unity. It's not a single unitary state, but a collection of autonomous nations.

Unironic national socialism sounds gay

The EU doesn't work because it's a collection of similar nations ruled by a bunch of liberal capitalists interested only in making their pockets bigger rather than national pride or traditional values

Aka: false equivalency

I support many similar policies to fascism. Traditionalism, state intervention into the economy, etc. But I disagree with racialism.

Exactly, and that's GOOD. The point of Eurasia is to stop a unipolar world from happening. The point of Eurasia is to stop the parasitic influence of liberalism which spreads from American imperialism.

It isn't to create a united state echoing the same values.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

That's so dumb though

How are you going to combat liberalism if you're all divided and isolated

Let's see how that worked out for Libya.

Or literally any other place without allies.

Oh jesus. Your first mistake is to assume that Eurasia is a conventional imperialist empire. It's not a single state in which there is one military, one civil government, one law, one ruler. That's unrealistic and would frankly collapse like the USSR.

Eurasianism is defined as a worldview which strives to create a multipolar world of maximum autonomy (not only politically and economically but also culturally, ethnically, spiritually, etc.) for all the many regions and civilizational spheres on the planet; therefore the fundamental Eurasianist mission in the 21st century is to destroy unipolar Atlanticist world hegemony and to coordinate and promote all the many forces which are opposed to the unipolar Atlanticist mission of Globalization – i.e. the total liberalization of the entire planet.

For example, Putin's Russia is an example of proto-Eurasianism, in the sense that he's allied to many anti-liberal nations of different cultures. For example, Iran, Syria, China and Venezuela.

Fuck off. If you think that's word salad you haven't read Mein Kampf

Yes, it's a made up term. What is language but that?

Real words that other people made up? I'm sorry nibba, that's some intellectual dissonance.