Message from @Nuke

Discord ID: 489568016649158657


2018-09-12 22:46:08 UTC  

in fact

2018-09-12 22:46:12 UTC  

I'm pretty sure he isn't

2018-09-12 22:46:16 UTC  

I tihnk he's using his intuition

2018-09-12 22:46:20 UTC  

and knowledge of how each state is

2018-09-12 22:46:21 UTC  

Indeed.

2018-09-12 22:46:29 UTC  

Ohio is also more pro-Trump than Arizona.

2018-09-12 22:46:30 UTC  

if I based it on polls as they are right now

2018-09-12 22:46:35 UTC  

I'd be predicting le blue wave

2018-09-12 22:46:38 UTC  

but....no point doing so

2018-09-12 22:46:53 UTC  

Plus a lot of these states are data deficient, poll-wise, anyway

2018-09-12 22:46:55 UTC  

let's see what the polls are in Late October and November 1-5

2018-09-12 22:47:19 UTC  

If I see one Emerson poll saying Iowa is leaning blue, not only am I not going to take it seriously, but most of the poll analysts aren't actually taking it seriously either.

2018-09-12 22:47:37 UTC  

Emerson is even mocked by the libtards on US Election Atlas and PredictIt

2018-09-12 22:47:40 UTC  

they call it 'memerson'

2018-09-12 22:47:45 UTC  

They got it close in OH-12...but

2018-09-12 22:47:53 UTC  

but...that was probably because they just copied Monmouth

2018-09-12 22:47:53 UTC  

lol

2018-09-12 22:47:57 UTC  

Indeed, lol.

2018-09-12 22:48:10 UTC  

I factored polls into a few of these races actually, but not all.

2018-09-12 22:48:26 UTC  

I think they deliberately wait until an actual polling firm does something, and then they release a new poll close to the election, that's deliberately close to the other poll

2018-09-12 22:48:30 UTC  

Oklahoma is purely poll-based, for instance; its Governor has low approval.

2018-09-12 22:48:49 UTC  

their polls that are held long before an election are probably pulled out of their ey ess ess

2018-09-12 22:49:04 UTC  

Yep.

2018-09-12 22:52:45 UTC  

Emerson, Gravis and various other polls are truly shit.

2018-09-12 22:52:57 UTC  

But Marist, Surveyusa, Rasmussen and so on are more reliable.

2018-09-12 22:54:47 UTC  

I mean if you're going to mark Michigan as a tilt R and Ohio as a likely R, you may as well mark NV as tilt R as well

2018-09-12 22:56:40 UTC  

Nevada is increasingly Hispanic; Trump lost there and the situation has only gotten worse due to liberal Californians entering the state; polls suggest that Heller has a better chance.

2018-09-12 22:58:33 UTC  

Laxalt's the guy running, he's in a political dynasty over there, and he's won over half the polls over there

2018-09-12 22:59:29 UTC  

Definitely a lot more likely he wins than Heller

2018-09-12 23:03:24 UTC  

Regardless, both races are in the margin of error.

2018-09-12 23:03:49 UTC  

(PPP & Laxalt internal polls claim that their respective candidates have exited said margins of error, however.)

2018-09-12 23:04:01 UTC  

Thus, they are tossups**.

2018-09-12 23:04:16 UTC  

Yep, they're tilts.

2018-09-12 23:06:27 UTC  

NV - tossup, AZ tilt-lean GOP, MI tilt-lean Dem, OH tossup, Georgia tossup

2018-09-12 23:07:30 UTC  

Toss-up GA is ridiculous.

2018-09-12 23:08:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/445296215161176064/489573141987852288/unknown.png

2018-09-12 23:09:41 UTC  

Arizona voted 3% for Trump after DECADES of voting GOP. The electorate is changing.

2018-09-12 23:10:04 UTC  

I still think Kemp will win but a tilt is inconsistent.

2018-09-12 23:10:15 UTC  

They voted for Clinton in 1996.

2018-09-12 23:10:19 UTC  

apply the same principles to democrats as you do gop