Message from @zakattack04

Discord ID: 434773107681525762


2018-04-14 17:50:02 UTC  

I don't think you heard the article right

2018-04-14 17:50:39 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 they hit chemical factories

2018-04-14 17:50:47 UTC  

That was the strategic importance

2018-04-14 17:50:58 UTC  

Removing the industrial suppliers for the Syrians

2018-04-14 17:51:07 UTC  

that's symbolic

2018-04-14 17:51:10 UTC  

The syrian government launched missiles against the american strike, but missed.

2018-04-14 17:51:15 UTC  

No it's not

2018-04-14 17:51:17 UTC  

That was the article.

2018-04-14 17:51:18 UTC  

That's strategic dude lol

2018-04-14 17:51:46 UTC  

unless Trump initiates a ground invasion, it will have no meaningful impact

2018-04-14 17:51:48 UTC  

3 chemical sites were destroyed.

2018-04-14 17:51:49 UTC  

It's targeting the supporting structures of the war effort

2018-04-14 17:51:58 UTC  

Infrastructure, industry

2018-04-14 17:52:02 UTC  

That's what this was

2018-04-14 17:52:11 UTC  

It want symbolic, it was a strategic surgical strike

2018-04-14 17:52:20 UTC  

Lol what

2018-04-14 17:52:39 UTC  

Drumpf fell for a false flag

2018-04-14 17:52:41 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 did we need to initiate a ground invasion into Japan?

2018-04-14 17:52:45 UTC  

no chemical weapons were used

2018-04-14 17:53:01 UTC  

We used fire bombing and conventional bombing to bring them to their knees

2018-04-14 17:53:06 UTC  

The nukes were symbolic

2018-04-14 17:53:11 UTC  

Anyways, we all know the real reasoning for the strike, this is all really for a message for North Korea.

2018-04-14 17:53:20 UTC  

we didn't need a "ground invasion" Button Mash lol

2018-04-14 17:53:38 UTC  

I think there's a lot of stuff we don't know

2018-04-14 17:53:40 UTC  

That's it. The strikes did, incidentally, destroy chemical sites, though, so that gives it a layer of legitimacy.

2018-04-14 17:53:45 UTC  

I reject most conspiracy theories. But this 'gas attack' was one of the most amateurish false flags I have ever seen.

2018-04-14 17:54:19 UTC  

Why would Assad use chemical weapons on his own people when he's winning?

2018-04-14 17:54:26 UTC  

So you're conceding it was strategic over "symbolic" then?

2018-04-14 17:54:32 UTC  

No

2018-04-14 17:54:35 UTC  

You can't apply conventional logic to foreign leaders

2018-04-14 17:54:42 UTC  

And their war efforts lol

2018-04-14 17:54:53 UTC  

Geopolitics is a very complex subject.

2018-04-14 17:55:00 UTC  

I don't believe Assad did the strike, no.

2018-04-14 17:55:00 UTC  

BREAKING: Nikki Haley at UN: 'United States is locked and loaded' against Syria if 'foolish enough to test our will' (VIDEO):
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2018/04/breaking-nikki-haley-at-un-united-states-is-locked-and-loaded-against-syria-if-foolish-enough-to-test-our-will-video/

2018-04-14 17:55:03 UTC  

You can with leaders of major countries because they're generally more level headed

2018-04-14 17:55:13 UTC  

Nikki Haley is a bitch

2018-04-14 17:55:16 UTC  

this strike fails on all levels

2018-04-14 17:55:21 UTC  

1. Will only appease the neocons for a few days. They will demand more blood.
2. Did nothing to hurt Syria
3. Expensive
4. Upset Trump's base
5. Leftists claim it was "wag the dog" to divert focus from Russian investigation

2018-04-14 17:55:24 UTC  

She's the most outspoken out of anyone on Syria.

2018-04-14 17:55:32 UTC  

>did nothing to hurt Syria

2018-04-14 17:55:38 UTC  

See this is the problem