Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃
Discord ID: 434772609486553100
It's happened before, and it was disastrous for the Republicans, if we do it again it'll be even worse because the person the Democrats run is going to be extremely left wing.
So
Probably no more attacks
US is saying mission accomplish, etc etc
Well, they destroyed chemical plants and that's it.
So the mission might actually be accomplished.
"plants"""
Welp
All 210 cruise missiles hit their target
Without interception
oof
at least he's pretty much won the war now
Russian military sad
@zakattack04 @FLanon This is why the logic of the "symbolic strike" fails. If you bomb a country and you don't do any damage, then why do it? It makes you look dumb to everyone. It's an obviously strategically incoherent move and is indicative of a schizophrenic White House. Just say no to neocons.
I don't think you heard the article right
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 they hit chemical factories
That was the strategic importance
Removing the industrial suppliers for the Syrians
The syrian government launched missiles against the american strike, but missed.
No it's not
That was the article.
That's strategic dude lol
unless Trump initiates a ground invasion, it will have no meaningful impact
3 chemical sites were destroyed.
It's targeting the supporting structures of the war effort
Infrastructure, industry
That's what this was
It want symbolic, it was a strategic surgical strike
Lol what
Drumpf fell for a false flag
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 did we need to initiate a ground invasion into Japan?
no chemical weapons were used
We used fire bombing and conventional bombing to bring them to their knees
The nukes were symbolic
Anyways, we all know the real reasoning for the strike, this is all really for a message for North Korea.
we didn't need a "ground invasion" Button Mash lol
I think there's a lot of stuff we don't know
That's it. The strikes did, incidentally, destroy chemical sites, though, so that gives it a layer of legitimacy.