Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃

Discord ID: 434772772212834304


2018-04-14 17:43:58 UTC  

Well, they destroyed chemical plants and that's it.

2018-04-14 17:44:12 UTC  

So the mission might actually be accomplished.

2018-04-14 17:46:29 UTC  

"plants"""

2018-04-14 17:48:16 UTC  

Welp

2018-04-14 17:48:27 UTC  

All 210 cruise missiles hit their target

2018-04-14 17:48:32 UTC  

Without interception

2018-04-14 17:48:45 UTC  

oof

2018-04-14 17:48:51 UTC  

at least he's pretty much won the war now

2018-04-14 17:48:54 UTC  

Russian military sad

2018-04-14 17:49:26 UTC  

@zakattack04 @FLanon This is why the logic of the "symbolic strike" fails. If you bomb a country and you don't do any damage, then why do it? It makes you look dumb to everyone. It's an obviously strategically incoherent move and is indicative of a schizophrenic White House. Just say no to neocons.

2018-04-14 17:50:02 UTC  

I don't think you heard the article right

2018-04-14 17:50:39 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 they hit chemical factories

2018-04-14 17:50:47 UTC  

That was the strategic importance

2018-04-14 17:50:58 UTC  

Removing the industrial suppliers for the Syrians

2018-04-14 17:51:07 UTC  

that's symbolic

2018-04-14 17:51:10 UTC  

The syrian government launched missiles against the american strike, but missed.

2018-04-14 17:51:15 UTC  

No it's not

2018-04-14 17:51:17 UTC  

That was the article.

2018-04-14 17:51:18 UTC  

That's strategic dude lol

2018-04-14 17:51:46 UTC  

unless Trump initiates a ground invasion, it will have no meaningful impact

2018-04-14 17:51:48 UTC  

3 chemical sites were destroyed.

2018-04-14 17:51:49 UTC  

It's targeting the supporting structures of the war effort

2018-04-14 17:51:58 UTC  

Infrastructure, industry

2018-04-14 17:52:02 UTC  

That's what this was

2018-04-14 17:52:11 UTC  

It want symbolic, it was a strategic surgical strike

2018-04-14 17:52:20 UTC  

Lol what

2018-04-14 17:52:39 UTC  

Drumpf fell for a false flag

2018-04-14 17:52:41 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 did we need to initiate a ground invasion into Japan?

2018-04-14 17:52:45 UTC  

no chemical weapons were used

2018-04-14 17:53:01 UTC  

We used fire bombing and conventional bombing to bring them to their knees

2018-04-14 17:53:06 UTC  

The nukes were symbolic

2018-04-14 17:53:11 UTC  

Anyways, we all know the real reasoning for the strike, this is all really for a message for North Korea.

2018-04-14 17:53:20 UTC  

we didn't need a "ground invasion" Button Mash lol

2018-04-14 17:53:38 UTC  

I think there's a lot of stuff we don't know

2018-04-14 17:53:40 UTC  

That's it. The strikes did, incidentally, destroy chemical sites, though, so that gives it a layer of legitimacy.

2018-04-14 17:53:45 UTC  

I reject most conspiracy theories. But this 'gas attack' was one of the most amateurish false flags I have ever seen.

2018-04-14 17:54:19 UTC  

Why would Assad use chemical weapons on his own people when he's winning?

2018-04-14 17:54:26 UTC  

So you're conceding it was strategic over "symbolic" then?

2018-04-14 17:54:32 UTC  

No

2018-04-14 17:54:35 UTC  

You can't apply conventional logic to foreign leaders