Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 448923678046945280


2018-05-23 18:04:21 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/448909064995340300/image.png

2018-05-23 18:04:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/448909224957968384/image.png

2018-05-23 18:12:28 UTC  

West Virginia Senate GE: Manchin (D) 47% (+7) Morrisey (R) 40% Hollen (L) 4%

2018-05-23 18:17:39 UTC  

For Georgia in 2014, the dem was unopposed which might have something to do with it, not as much of a reason to go out to the polls. Still a bad thing though, I'd have to agree.

2018-05-23 18:18:55 UTC  

also, looks like nuke has a new pfp huh

2018-05-23 18:22:04 UTC  

I think 2022 is too far out to make any determinate calls, depending on how 2018 and 2020 go, there could be a number of ways it could turn out. If the environment is good with a productive congress and we've built up a very sturdy majority in the Senate, it will be manageable. It is a pretty bad map for us generally though, and probably devastating if we had that map this year.

2018-05-23 18:22:45 UTC  
2018-05-23 18:48:22 UTC  

we gotta take em as they come

2018-05-23 18:55:59 UTC  
2018-05-23 18:57:19 UTC  

@FLanon still not sure where BM got that poll that showed McGrath 15 points ahead of Barr

2018-05-23 18:57:48 UTC  

yeah I found it

2018-05-23 18:58:01 UTC  

it was before, not after the primary yesterday

2018-05-23 18:58:03 UTC  

anyway, @Nuke

2018-05-23 18:58:23 UTC  

it was commissioned by the DCCC, so, grain of salt there

2018-05-23 18:58:34 UTC  

500 people asked by landline

2018-05-23 18:59:30 UTC  

about 2022

if Chuck Schumer retires and is replaced by a Roy Moore tier Dem, I can see us taking a seat in New York with a Scott Brown tier R in 2022

same with California and Illinois and Vermont and Connecticut and Maryland

Nevada and New Hampshire and Colorado should be competitive even without a Roy Moore tier Dem

2018-05-23 19:00:42 UTC  

@Pielover19 assuming Trump is POTUS in 2022, it'll be similar to 2018, which means that the environment favors the D's. However, like 2018, that doesn't guarantee a D victory in the same way that a D victory wasn't guaranteed in 2022

2018-05-23 19:00:53 UTC  

*in the same way a D victory wasn't guaranteed in 2002

2018-05-23 19:01:10 UTC  

I might not be so sure it's similar to 2018 depending on some circumstances

2018-05-23 19:01:52 UTC  

>BM literally spending most of xir energy, time, and focus on posting Democrat propaganda

2018-05-23 19:02:25 UTC  

@FLanon something tells me that Trump in his 2nd term would not compromise as much as in his 1st term

2018-05-23 19:02:33 UTC  

If we were to get a mandate congressionally this year followed by a victory in 2020, 2022's environment may be more favorable to Rs, however considering the map, it'll take a lot to get a net gain in the senate.

2018-05-23 19:02:39 UTC  

in the same way that Obama in his 2nd term was less conciliatory in comparison to his first term

2018-05-23 19:03:17 UTC  

also...2022 will be around the time people my age could be winning House seats, come to think of it

2018-05-23 19:03:50 UTC  

the minimum age for the House is 25, but the youngest one right now is Elise Stefanik at 33 (actually, I think Conor Lamb might be a few months younger)

2018-05-23 19:04:07 UTC  

I recall in 2008 a Republican named Aaron Schock won at age 27

2018-05-23 19:04:35 UTC  

Mine would have to be like 2024 or 2026 I think

2018-05-23 19:05:00 UTC  

at the earliest because I do have to start early in this day and age unlike certain people

2018-05-23 19:16:51 UTC  

I think the requirement for state legislature isn't as high

2018-05-23 19:17:15 UTC  

btw, I highly recommend volunteering with the Republican Party in your area this year though

2018-05-23 19:23:16 UTC  

also, speaking of 2022, let's talk about 2020

2018-05-23 19:25:33 UTC  

if the environment is favorable to a Trump re-election....

Ousting Doug Jones in Alabama seems effortless

taking that D seat in New Hampshire is not as easy, but definitely doable. Same thing with the seat in Michigan.

Minnesota should be about as hard as Michigan. Virginia could be around the same level.

2018-05-23 19:26:30 UTC  

in the same way that Democrats in 2012 generally benefited from having Obama at the top of the ballot, Republicans in 2020 will benefit from having Trump at the top of the ballot

2018-05-23 19:27:13 UTC  

if it's a Trump landslide year, I could see the R's taking those other solidly blue states as well, with Scott Brown tier candidates

2018-05-23 19:27:16 UTC  

We'll have to see how far it travels

2018-05-23 19:27:27 UTC  

how far what travels ?

2018-05-23 19:28:32 UTC  

Trump, depending on his performance, he could pave the way for Minnesota, Virginia, Oregon maybe.

2018-05-23 19:29:49 UTC  

It'll depend on 2018 to a large extent, productivity in Congress leading to Trump getting his promises passed would almost certainly secure reelection.

2018-05-23 19:32:58 UTC  

Obama and Trump are similar in many ways, like the fact that their base got pretty frustrated in their first year and a half, but one big difference between Obama and Trump is

Obama won in 2008 at a pretty high level of popularity, but there was nowhere to go but down, so it makes sense that he won by less in 2012

Trump won in 2016 in a very polarizing way, and his popularity was arguably low at the time, but that means there's nowhere to go but up

a huge reason why I'm so optimistic is the "normalization" phenomenon. You know how in the first days of the Trump admin, you had all these leftists screeching about refusing to 'normalize' Trump and how "this is NOT normal. I am literally shaking" ? Well, there's a good reason for them to be scared about that. The reason is because the millions of voters who sat home or voted Hillary or third party could easily view Trump as better than expected, which means that it's not so hard for Trump to win in 2020 at even greater margins

2018-05-23 19:33:32 UTC  

Guys, do you think it’s possible to repeal the 15th amendment?