Message from @Earl of Morrrrgantown

Discord ID: 484079388426502156


2018-08-28 19:13:25 UTC  

I think that in every district there's a nonzero chance

2018-08-28 19:13:29 UTC  

well, yeah

2018-08-28 19:13:38 UTC  

And with that nonzero chance, you have to try your hardest to grab it, all I'm saying

2018-08-28 19:13:40 UTC  

Never give up

2018-08-28 19:13:58 UTC  

How's everyone today

2018-08-28 19:14:44 UTC  

tbh, I think we should get some Republicans to run strong Green Party Campaigns

2018-08-28 19:14:53 UTC  

So we can steal votes

2018-08-28 19:15:12 UTC  

@shrub I'm Good

2018-08-28 19:15:13 UTC  

Just talk about how the Green Party is rising and the Democrats are falling

2018-08-28 19:15:19 UTC  

it'd be hard to coordinate

2018-08-28 19:15:21 UTC  

talk about Turning point/walk away whatever it is

2018-08-28 19:15:25 UTC  

and divide and conquer

2018-08-28 19:15:42 UTC  

I suspect people would see right through that a lot of the time

2018-08-28 19:15:53 UTC  

Talk about how the Democrats are corporate and bought. Talk about how foreign governments pay them and how they accuse their enemies of doing it

2018-08-28 19:16:15 UTC  

Talk about Saul Alinsky and how prominent democrats and democratic dynasties are Alinskyites

2018-08-28 19:16:19 UTC  

@FLanon People are dumb

2018-08-28 19:17:02 UTC  

Yeah but not sure hard Dems would leave to green on a whim

2018-08-28 19:17:21 UTC  

Greens catch a ton of flack in tighter elections like Ohio, lot of people don't buy into it

2018-08-28 19:18:20 UTC  

He isn't a WN

2018-08-28 19:18:31 UTC  

I'll see if Trump actually does something

2018-08-28 19:18:39 UTC  

Tbh, I think Trump should invite Peter Brimelow into his cabinet

2018-08-28 19:18:52 UTC  

Or maybe Coulter, just to be safe

2018-08-28 19:20:20 UTC  

Based on him saying Probably will reach far beyond the scope of just Google, probably could influence the entirety of social media considering Trump said "Google & others", implying Twitter and maybe also Facebook

2018-08-28 19:20:35 UTC  

@ThatRightWingFish Fuck WN. America shouldn't be for whites only, It should be for Western Europeans only

2018-08-28 19:20:44 UTC  

No

2018-08-28 19:21:12 UTC  

Most white immigrants, besides Northwestern europeans, vote Democrat

2018-08-28 19:21:18 UTC  

No one that has heritage outside of Cornwall should be considered American

2018-08-28 19:22:14 UTC  

Anyways, let's get back on track

2018-08-28 19:22:46 UTC  

Let's say Trump does an Executive Order along these lines

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/484080422221905940/DkHNrm4VAAE_YDu.png

2018-08-28 19:23:13 UTC  

It's a legislative proposal but I think Trump can say something similar to this

2018-08-28 19:23:16 UTC  

Got it from Button

2018-08-28 19:23:24 UTC  

@ThatRightWingFish I don't know tbh. He probably falls into the crowd of hating boomers, wanting to end immigration, etc

2018-08-28 19:23:36 UTC  

Inevitably, this will have to go through the Supreme Court

2018-08-28 19:23:51 UTC  

Which I can agree with. But tbh, I think thats only the first step

2018-08-28 19:24:54 UTC  

Their interpretations of "Social Media" are incredibly massive, including WebMD and Amazon.com as "social media". They are also incredibly broad on free speech, and have described social media as the modern public forum unanimously in a previous ruling.

2018-08-28 19:26:29 UTC  

tbh, this guy should have been POTUS

2018-08-28 19:27:20 UTC  

"Even with these assumptions, the statute here enacts a prohibition
unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate
with one another on any subject that might come to mind.
With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many
are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for
employment, **speaking and listening in the modern public square**,
and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents
users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment
rights. Even convicted criminals—and in some instances especially
convicted criminals—might receive legitimate benefits from
these means for access to the world of ideas, particularly if they seek
to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives. "
-Packingham v. North Carolina

2018-08-28 19:27:57 UTC  

I suspect it would take a while for the court to get to this theoretical EO, but in the end they would rule in our favor