Message from @Payo502
Discord ID: 575050292274397190
It's hard to understand complex things, that's why they're complex
Theres no scientific evidence to cover things like flat earth, governmentally spread messages are backed up
Which turns people away
That entire article is a perfect example
There is not a single model that answers all the criteria the globe does that a flat earther can produce
It's written by a troglodyte who knows nothing about cosmology.
No *single* model will answer all that
that s scientific america
Just by the usage of certain words
You require multiple models
I don't care what it is.
<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Payo502 has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```
Who publishes what doesn't matter.
What matters is what the article says.
And it's a bunch of baloney.
eh idk
Jeremy youre suggesting science is false because theres no science behind it
im just showingu guys the article
And we're telling you the article is garbage.
And whoever wrote it deserves a smack on the head.
Scientific American (informally abbreviated SciAm or sometimes SA) is an American popular science magazine. Many famous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have contributed articles to it. It is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States (though it only became monthly in 1921).
sounds prestigious
>pop-science magazine
Which is exactly the dumbed down garbage we mentioned
I only trust true scientists
Like bill nye
Just because some of the people who write/wrote articles for it are famous or writing in good faith, doesn't mean all are
Just like just because it is Einstein writing an article doesn't mean it should be taken as fact off the bat
People make mistakes, sometimes deliberately, so you have to ensure all of the content is correct
I comply
From what I've heard, not all of that article may be
so that article is totally wrong u think scientific american is in the business of publishing false things
or we just cherry pick whatever fits ur beliefs ?
How can you say that siam is falsw because there is no HARD evidence behind it while you are complying to ideologies which are su blatantly made up on the spot with little to no realistic evidence behind them
?
So, unlike us, you are the one cherry picking whatever fits y
Ur beliefs
Ur claiming the sciam is false arent you
i was showing that article becuase cosmology has big problems thats all
they arent wrong imo
Based on a obviously false article, you are ignoring thousands of scientists conclusions of cosmology