Message from @「阿波根うみこ」
Discord ID: 575049755013545995
He doesnt have enough experience in the topic to truely be cited at a source
Honestly I wouldn't listen to any of the public pop-scientists about anything
Their job is to give knowledge to the public
<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Bannebie has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```
The problem is that the public is stupid.
So they have to dumb down topics for the laymen until the informations gets diluted and becomes meaningless.
Thats true
Actual scientific conclusions seem to be ignored by the public simply due to their inability to understand
Which leads to what we saw above, inaccurste spread of information
Oh yes, absolutely. Most people have absolutely no clue what those proposed ideas actually entail
And so a lot of people come to some really weird conclusions sometimes
scientific conclusions seem to be ignored cause their isnt empirical evidence to back them up
did u read the article i posted
That's why there are things like flat Earthers and anti-vaxxers, because things get omitted and dumbed down to the point where it's easy to ignore it and come to your own conclusions
Thats nowhere near true
Scientific conclusions are accepted by the scientific community, but the laymen only accept the dumbed down versions of it.
Born out of a cosmic explosion 13.8 billion years ago, the universe rapidly inflated and then cooled, it is still expanding at an increasing rate and mostly made up of unknown dark matter and dark energy ... right?
This well-known story is usually taken as a self-evident scientific fact, despite the relative lack of empirical evidence—and despite a steady crop of discrepancies arising with observations of the distant universe.
thats the first paragraph
scientific america
Theres no scientific evidence to cover things like flat earth, governmentally spread messages are backed up
Which turns people away
That entire article is a perfect example
There is not a single model that answers all the criteria the globe does that a flat earther can produce
It's written by a troglodyte who knows nothing about cosmology.
No *single* model will answer all that
that s scientific america
Just by the usage of certain words
You require multiple models
I don't care what it is.
<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Payo502 has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```
Who publishes what doesn't matter.
What matters is what the article says.
And it's a bunch of baloney.
eh idk
Jeremy youre suggesting science is false because theres no science behind it
im just showingu guys the article
And we're telling you the article is garbage.
And whoever wrote it deserves a smack on the head.
The obviously uneducstional and inaccurate artical proves our point