Thats true

Actual scientific conclusions seem to be ignored by the public simply due to their inability to understand

Which leads to what we saw above, inaccurste spread of information

Oh yes, absolutely. Most people have absolutely no clue what those proposed ideas actually entail

And so a lot of people come to some really weird conclusions sometimes

scientific conclusions seem to be ignored cause their isnt empirical evidence to back them up

did u read the article i posted

That's why there are things like flat Earthers and anti-vaxxers, because things get omitted and dumbed down to the point where it's easy to ignore it and come to your own conclusions

Thats nowhere near true

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/cosmology-has-some-big-problems/

Scientific conclusions are accepted by the scientific community, but the laymen only accept the dumbed down versions of it.

Born out of a cosmic explosion 13.8 billion years ago, the universe rapidly inflated and then cooled, it is still expanding at an increasing rate and mostly made up of unknown dark matter and dark energy ... right?

This well-known story is usually taken as a self-evident scientific fact, despite the relative lack of empirical evidence—and despite a steady crop of discrepancies arising with observations of the distant universe.

thats the first paragraph

scientific america

It's hard to understand complex things, that's why they're complex

Theres no scientific evidence to cover things like flat earth, governmentally spread messages are backed up

Which turns people away

That entire article is a perfect example

There is not a single model that answers all the criteria the globe does that a flat earther can produce

It's written by a troglodyte who knows nothing about cosmology.

No *single* model will answer all that

that s scientific america

Just by the usage of certain words

You require multiple models

I don't care what it is.

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Payo502 has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

Who publishes what doesn't matter.

What matters is what the article says.

And it's a bunch of baloney.

eh idk

Jeremy youre suggesting science is false because theres no science behind it

im just showingu guys the article

And we're telling you the article is garbage.

And whoever wrote it deserves a smack on the head.

The obviously uneducstional and inaccurate artical proves our point

Scientific American (informally abbreviated SciAm or sometimes SA) is an American popular science magazine. Many famous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have contributed articles to it. It is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States (though it only became monthly in 1921).

sounds prestigious

>pop-science magazine

Which is exactly the dumbed down garbage we mentioned

I only trust true scientists

Like bill nye