Message from @「阿波根うみこ」

Discord ID: 575050923882184743


2019-05-06 20:03:10 UTC  

that s scientific america

2019-05-06 20:03:11 UTC  

Just by the usage of certain words

2019-05-06 20:03:15 UTC  

You require multiple models

2019-05-06 20:03:17 UTC  

I don't care what it is.

2019-05-06 20:03:25 UTC  

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Payo502 has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

2019-05-06 20:03:31 UTC  

Who publishes what doesn't matter.

2019-05-06 20:03:40 UTC  

What matters is what the article says.

2019-05-06 20:03:49 UTC  

And it's a bunch of baloney.

2019-05-06 20:03:52 UTC  

eh idk

2019-05-06 20:03:54 UTC  

Jeremy youre suggesting science is false because theres no science behind it

2019-05-06 20:04:06 UTC  

im just showingu guys the article

2019-05-06 20:04:19 UTC  

And we're telling you the article is garbage.

2019-05-06 20:04:33 UTC  

And whoever wrote it deserves a smack on the head.

2019-05-06 20:04:33 UTC  

The obviously uneducstional and inaccurate artical proves our point

2019-05-06 20:04:57 UTC  

Scientific American (informally abbreviated SciAm or sometimes SA) is an American popular science magazine. Many famous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have contributed articles to it. It is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States (though it only became monthly in 1921).

2019-05-06 20:05:09 UTC  

sounds prestigious

2019-05-06 20:05:16 UTC  

>pop-science magazine

2019-05-06 20:05:30 UTC  

Which is exactly the dumbed down garbage we mentioned

2019-05-06 20:06:13 UTC  

I only trust true scientists

2019-05-06 20:06:18 UTC  

Like bill nye

2019-05-06 20:07:04 UTC  

Just because some of the people who write/wrote articles for it are famous or writing in good faith, doesn't mean all are

2019-05-06 20:07:40 UTC  

Just like just because it is Einstein writing an article doesn't mean it should be taken as fact off the bat

2019-05-06 20:08:07 UTC  

People make mistakes, sometimes deliberately, so you have to ensure all of the content is correct

2019-05-06 20:08:23 UTC  

I comply

2019-05-06 20:08:24 UTC  

From what I've heard, not all of that article may be

2019-05-06 20:10:00 UTC  

so that article is totally wrong u think scientific american is in the business of publishing false things

2019-05-06 20:10:41 UTC  

or we just cherry pick whatever fits ur beliefs ?

2019-05-06 20:12:56 UTC  

How can you say that siam is falsw because there is no HARD evidence behind it while you are complying to ideologies which are su blatantly made up on the spot with little to no realistic evidence behind them

2019-05-06 20:13:33 UTC  

?

2019-05-06 20:13:36 UTC  

So, unlike us, you are the one cherry picking whatever fits y
Ur beliefs

2019-05-06 20:14:01 UTC  

Ur claiming the sciam is false arent you

2019-05-06 20:14:24 UTC  

i was showing that article becuase cosmology has big problems thats all

2019-05-06 20:14:43 UTC  

they arent wrong imo

2019-05-06 20:15:27 UTC  

Based on a obviously false article, you are ignoring thousands of scientists conclusions of cosmology

2019-05-06 20:15:44 UTC  

Had to take a shower, sorry

2019-05-06 20:15:47 UTC  

Where was I

2019-05-06 20:16:32 UTC  

Oh right. @jeremy Yes, the article is false. That one specifically, I mean.

2019-05-06 20:16:45 UTC  

That's why I said whoever wrote it has no idea what they're writing about.

2019-05-06 20:16:57 UTC  

You can tell from the words they chose to use.

2019-05-06 20:17:50 UTC  

yeah i dont believe much of what the mainstream says about cosmology so i feel u guys

2019-05-06 20:18:03 UTC  

i understand where ur coming from