Message from @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻
Discord ID: 421083900849291275
red flag?
False flag
The Resurrection (La Resurrezione) is an 800-quintal (8 metric ton) bronze/copper-alloy[1] sculpture by Pericle Fazzini in the Paul VI Audience Hall in Rome.[2][3] Intended to capture the anguish of 20th century mankind living under the threat of nuclear war,[1] La Resurrezione depicts Jesus rising from a nuclear crater in the Garden of Gethsemane.
The sculpture's dimensions are 66 ft × 23 ft × 10 ft (20.1 m × 7.0 m × 3.0 m).[3] The commission for the work was ordered by Count Galeassi in 1965; casting began at the Michelucci Art Foundry in Pistoia in 1972; the final sketch was produced in 1975; and the work was completed and inaugurated on September 28, 1977.
The original work was done in polystyrene and the fumes of the burning plastic gave Fazzini a blood clot during its production.[2] The statue was restored over three months in 2011.[1]
"With disdain I will throw my gauntlet
Full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant
Whose fall will not stifle my ardour.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious
Through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force,
I will feel equal to the Creator."
^ karl marx
That Jesus sculpture is Christ as his Oulanem figure.
Which itself is a Satanic inversion of Emanuel
yeah he was a satanist
he had good words though "all historical events happen twice, first time as a tragedy, second time as a farce"
words sourly forgotten if you ask me, and scarcely ever applied where they are in fact the most applicable
His critique of capitalism is spot on as is his discussion of the relationships between economic power politics and class
Everything else not so much
BUt that is mechanical thinking
His critique of capitalism is in essence the critique of a mechanical, class-organized society
Capitalist dynamics, as something that is in itself dependent on context, and is impartial per se, is not really subject to criticism
BUt obviously, by arguing for another class rule, Marx replaces one mechanical class revolution with another
Well I mean you can only really talk about thing as they actually happen and not as some contextless eternal truth or whatever
But i just ain't buying
Once labor is reduced to a commodity, it is insane to expect it won't become subject to simple market laws
But Bolshevism does not alter that. It only abolishes market, but not labor as commodity.
what are they going to do when enough labor is automated that labor as commodity has little if not negative value (higher error rate plus higher hourly cost than robots)
In fact, all the ways that Bolshevism penalizes the productive, is merely an attempt to fix a marketless society where labor is still a commodity (since everyone is a laborer, few would be able to make decent living by laboring)
that's going to hugely change shit
Not to mention that the entire principle itself, where every man is assumed a natural born laborer is simply so false, insane, made up and outright batshit insane, that talking about everything else with that as *a premise* is in itself pure subversion of dialogue
people on the right like to deny that any of that is happening
yeah
they'll have to hand out free money so that the country doesn't end up in an overproduction crisis
Labor, as a concept, is essentially industrial
I sure don't see man as inherently a laborer
most other men do so they are natural laborers though
boomer here do YOU millennials even WORK for a living???
man is inherently a GOD
Labor, as something organized around abstraction, is mechanical, *even if it deals with real needs*. That's why people are so attracted to possibility of return to agriculture, because agriculture lacks this abstract quality
POCs have the mark of cain, they may never hold the priesthood, they cannot go to heaven
Most people find labor uninspiring and tormenting, and to make this world into a labor paradise is an act of cruelty
agricultural civs had their abstract autism too though