Message from @diversity_is_racism
Discord ID: 426728041188687873
TO THEM, LIFE WAS PRECIOUS AND EASILY DAMAGED
EVEN BY IDEAS
Yes, but It kind of makes me uneasy to read the most acclaimed Philosophers and to see that they didnt really bother to hit the very center
I mean, I understand their point, and their good purposes
However, say about love, they didn't really go to the very end in unraveling that
It is all aimed at beauty *but from a decidedly geriatric perspective*
Define geriatric
I refuse to do that
I can't help but think that Zen's idea of beauty is more decisive, both infinite but also devoid of idiosyncrasies, if somewhat fatalistic, but certainly transcends Doric drunkenness with soft feelings
Rome on the other hand ❤
THESE ARE NOT SOFT FEELINGS
THEY ARE THE HARDEST THAT EXIST
A FORM OF LOVE FOR THE INTANGIBLE
ZEN CAN BE INFLUENTIAL BUT I FIND IT ULTIMATELY A FIXATION ON SOME BASIC IDEAS
Hmmm, I don't think Zen is fixed on any single idea, in fact, Zen contains absolutely no ideas at all
I was more thinking on the translation of Zen spirit into the ethical and aesthetic, that is to my comprehension more mature
In fact, from the position of pure aestheticism, Doric style and Zen style are essentially manifestations of one and the same
But from the perspective of the beauty of feelings and the comprehension of vital energies translating into social complexes such as love and romance, Plato was almost on par with Dostoevsky in his idealism.
Geriatric aesthetes for sure ! The extent to which they refuse to deal directly with ugly things at all in their writings. To them, maintenance of only pure, noble, soft and elevated "forms" at all times was almost like a necessary nutrient
Diogenes was the best Greek
NO MATTER HOW MUCH IT CLAIMS OTHERWISE
I FIND IT KIND OF SIMPLE ACTUALLY
IT IS A CERTAIN TYPE OF REALISM
BASED NOT ON TRANSCENDENTALISM BUT TEMPORALISM
SORT OF LIKE HINDUISM CROSSED WITH SHINTO
Mahayana -> chan + Shinto = zen
CLOSE ENOUGH FOR ME
👍
DIOGENES WAS FUN BECAUSE HE WAS A LITERALIST
REALISM IS A BIT MORE IDEALISTIC
IN THE SENSE OF GERMANIC IDEALISM
BUT I LIKE HIS GROUCHINESS
"HUMANITY... FUCKIN' BLIGHT"
Zen isn't realism, certainly not Shinto and even much less temporalism
Zen is derived from early Tantrism, originates from India, touches "Shinto" only on the plane of appearances, much like Tibetan or Mongolian folk touches Vajrayana. Zen decidedly IS transcendentalism, but unfortunately, its method is not widely understood, and is somewhat impenetrable for philosophy and dialectics
Zen places so much emphasis on the "unsayable" (Zen koans illustrate this well), that any polemical Zen is almost impossible to conceive of
Mahayanism is a much wider definition than Zen, so Zen does not derive form it, but it can be included in Mahayanist tradition, but then again, it can also be included also in Tantric tradition, but emphasis is slightly more contemplative and meditative
TRANSCENDENTALISM IS INHERENT
THE "UNSAYABLE" IS JUST A RIFF ON NIHILISM
COMMUNICATION DOES NOT EXIST