Message from @UOC
Discord ID: 428998001101635584
to this very day, I'm helped in knowing where to put and where to omit "the" only through slowly and progressively built intuition
I have to re-read text and to figure out by rhythm if I have somewhere mistakenly put "the" where it should not be, which may sound bizarre to native speakers who think in different terms alltogether
You should study, from crow, as to best write your "the", wherein one must also find the best place for the comma, which is, in fact, the greatest gift the god (of Reality), ever bestowed upon its children.
I'm a master of commas
Commas are entirely subject to my superb sense for rhythm to which I shall admit I'm better suited in my native tongue where my rhythm is so flawlessly Caesarean and pristine
I bend everything to conform to rhythm. I re-read things aloud in my head to figure out if the text has been butchered when it comes to diction, rhythm, flow
You're Italian?
Nothing worse than intellectual diatribes that one read as if he is reading a pharmaceutical manual
No
...
what then?
My native tongue is Serbian, which makes my job twice as difficult
Too many foreign word we have which obstruct fluent speech, but only occasionally augment it
Did you mean Caeserean as in a C-Section?
No, I mean Cesarean as in the style of Julius Caesar
I'm afraid I will never achieve a grand style of writing in English, possibly due to lack of immersion in culture, which does not allow me to understand completely what Anglophone people consider unnatural and mechanical in speech . Joseph Conrad is one stunning example of a foreigner who seems to have completely grasped it on the other hand.
But his ability seem miles ahead of mine
Study nester.
Nabokov mastered english prose too
although Conrad is certainly grander, I don't think N lacked the ability to write grandly if he had wanted to
very high status family
Find the Bristow
Bristow Palin
WHERE IS NESTER?
SOMEONE BROUGHT HIM BACK. HE SHOULD STAY.
Nester is probably at his computer sitting zazen in ascetic contemplation of metal tier list Dharma
@Arthur Konrad Hey, there's two of you. Also, this is a little bit old of a comment but, how can the Elites have so much control without their nonsense being seen as good by the people? The People keep the fauxlites in power. Co-dependency is a scenario rife with hate no matter how attached everyone is to each other.
@Draugra#1319 Your view completely omits the existence of vast and complex technical frameworks
What people who control these frameworks need is the capacities themselves, and people necessary to operate them
People who are necessary to operate them are already bought by their inclusion in the structure
Everything else can be manipulated through the action-reaction principle
You can manufacture a consequence with such power no matter how much people dont wish those consequences, merely by giving them a powerful stimulus to act your way
For this reason alone is democracy distributed, which wherever the system is absent tends to perish quickly
Democracy is very potent at distributing your stimulus, so people will perform a necessary operation that will eventually lead to results *you* demand
So only two principles oppose the system, namely, the nurturing of absolute and lucid sovereignty, and promotion of relativism and cynicism regarding *all* motions produced within the system
But even that taken into account, nobody really has a proper response to the might of the technological-political complex except to propagate against it *conceptually*
To insist that whatever is produced under its framework is ultimately bad