Message from @UOC

Discord ID: 428997802882760705


2018-03-29 19:06:32 UTC  

Yeah I probably will

2018-03-29 19:06:45 UTC  

I'm too autistic to be a litigator

2018-03-29 19:06:58 UTC  

to this very day, I'm helped in knowing where to put and where to omit "the" only through slowly and progressively built intuition

2018-03-29 19:07:48 UTC  

I have to re-read text and to figure out by rhythm if I have somewhere mistakenly put "the" where it should not be, which may sound bizarre to native speakers who think in different terms alltogether

2018-03-29 19:09:32 UTC  

You should study, from crow, as to best write your "the", wherein one must also find the best place for the comma, which is, in fact, the greatest gift the god (of Reality), ever bestowed upon its children.

2018-03-29 19:10:07 UTC  

I'm a master of commas

2018-03-29 19:10:49 UTC  

Commas are entirely subject to my superb sense for rhythm to which I shall admit I'm better suited in my native tongue where my rhythm is so flawlessly Caesarean and pristine

2018-03-29 19:11:27 UTC  

I bend everything to conform to rhythm. I re-read things aloud in my head to figure out if the text has been butchered when it comes to diction, rhythm, flow

2018-03-29 19:11:44 UTC  

You're Italian?

2018-03-29 19:11:44 UTC  

Nothing worse than intellectual diatribes that one read as if he is reading a pharmaceutical manual

2018-03-29 19:12:01 UTC  

No

2018-03-29 19:12:17 UTC  

...

2018-03-29 19:12:20 UTC  

what then?

2018-03-29 19:12:38 UTC  

My native tongue is Serbian, which makes my job twice as difficult

2018-03-29 19:12:59 UTC  

Too many foreign word we have which obstruct fluent speech, but only occasionally augment it

2018-03-29 19:13:06 UTC  

Did you mean Caeserean as in a C-Section?

2018-03-29 19:13:26 UTC  

No, I mean Cesarean as in the style of Julius Caesar

2018-03-29 19:15:43 UTC  

I'm afraid I will never achieve a grand style of writing in English, possibly due to lack of immersion in culture, which does not allow me to understand completely what Anglophone people consider unnatural and mechanical in speech . Joseph Conrad is one stunning example of a foreigner who seems to have completely grasped it on the other hand.

2018-03-29 19:16:58 UTC  

But his ability seem miles ahead of mine

2018-03-29 19:19:43 UTC  

Study nester.

2018-03-29 19:24:06 UTC  

Nabokov mastered english prose too

2018-03-29 19:24:24 UTC  

although Conrad is certainly grander, I don't think N lacked the ability to write grandly if he had wanted to

2018-03-29 19:24:53 UTC  

of course, he was speaking english very early

2018-03-29 19:25:02 UTC  

very high status family

2018-03-29 19:34:44 UTC  

Find the Bristow

2018-03-29 19:41:24 UTC  

Bristow Palin

2018-03-29 21:03:12 UTC  

WHERE IS NESTER?

2018-03-29 21:03:59 UTC  

SOMEONE BROUGHT HIM BACK. HE SHOULD STAY.

2018-03-29 21:16:31 UTC  

Nester is probably at his computer sitting zazen in ascetic contemplation of metal tier list Dharma

2018-03-29 22:16:22 UTC  

@Arthur Konrad Hey, there's two of you. Also, this is a little bit old of a comment but, how can the Elites have so much control without their nonsense being seen as good by the people? The People keep the fauxlites in power. Co-dependency is a scenario rife with hate no matter how attached everyone is to each other.

2018-03-30 14:04:05 UTC  

@Draugra#1319 Your view completely omits the existence of vast and complex technical frameworks

2018-03-30 14:04:29 UTC  

What people who control these frameworks need is the capacities themselves, and people necessary to operate them

2018-03-30 14:04:45 UTC  

People who are necessary to operate them are already bought by their inclusion in the structure

2018-03-30 14:05:05 UTC  

Everything else can be manipulated through the action-reaction principle

2018-03-30 14:05:45 UTC  

You can manufacture a consequence with such power no matter how much people dont wish those consequences, merely by giving them a powerful stimulus to act your way

2018-03-30 14:06:03 UTC  

For this reason alone is democracy distributed, which wherever the system is absent tends to perish quickly

2018-03-30 14:06:46 UTC  

Democracy is very potent at distributing your stimulus, so people will perform a necessary operation that will eventually lead to results *you* demand

2018-03-30 14:07:56 UTC  

So only two principles oppose the system, namely, the nurturing of absolute and lucid sovereignty, and promotion of relativism and cynicism regarding *all* motions produced within the system