Message from @Explain_It_Kakyion
Discord ID: 556179424601571401
huge lead balls are wire spinning... proves nothing
I can write things off just like you
Dum
Which Cavendish experiment can you provide that eliminates all variables? @BurDur
Doesn’t prove anything isn’t really a position.
The first one did
And Paul Heyl and all the others since then
Like, what do you think caused the results?
I guess that’s better wording
Cavendish was not a true experiment.
Sure it was
So, wind? Electricity?
🤔
Cavendish was an awesome experiment
Followed scientific method
!mute @HockeyPockey
HockeyPockey#3209 (553102909957472277) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
Kek
>>voicekick @HockeyPockey
`!voicekick` Perhaps?
!voicekick @HockeyPockey
Or does Vortex do the kicking?
🤔
He shouldn’t be banned
7 levels away from Gold, sheesh.
Wait, Citizen, what level are you at?
CURVATURE ZERO PROOF WITH SCIENTIFIC METHOD:
You're observing ships going over the horizon, you have your
Main Hypothesis
If the earth is a sphere, then ships travelling away from you will eventually disappear from view hull first
You are now flipping it around with a
Null Hypothesis
If the earth is a sphere, then ships travellign away from you WILL NOT eventually disapepar from view hull first
You are putting the cart before the horse, the dependent variable, the EFFECT :
Ships disapepar from view hull first
Your independent variable that you have to manipulate, the CAUSE:
Spherical earth
In order to reject/falsify the null hypothesis you MUST be able to physically manipulate the independent variable
Can you or anyone manipulate the Earth?
Meanwhile your NULL HYPOTHESIS can be falsified very easily with refraction, optical slant, convergence and angular resolution:
FLAT EARTH TORONTO BOTTOM UP OCCULTATION WITH REFRACTION: https://imgur.com/a/mpMigsS
FLAT EARTH CHICAGO BOTTOM UP OCCULTATION WITH REFRACTION: https://imgur.com/a/yx7PFD1
FLAT EARTH CONVERGENCE WALK: https://imgur.com/a/U0XUoJ2
Do you see the problem here? Your null hypothesis of "I can see ships disappearing hull first over the horizon, the Earth must be a sphere"
You are preaching an invalid scientific inquiry, a non sequitur fallacy and pseudoscience all at the same time.
@Human Sheeple oh stop your cut and paste QE. The independent variable was the mass and distance, which caused a change in torque on the torsion balance
Null hypothesis is no correlation to mass and change in torque
Easy stuff
@BurDur How did you eliminate CHARGE from an ELEVATED METAL object acting like and ANTENNA to show the observations were NOT due to COULOMB FORCE?
https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/UtqtnkMkpxGfCaEcSnD2xY09pSGqGk-atWln8RP1ogg/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/454328933626806283/476083743338266624/Sequence_01_23.gif
@Human Sheeple easy it was grounded uniform charge throughout
Show me cavendish with 4 volt meters set to the lowest setting to show there is ZERO NET VOLTAGE
@BurDur IT IS DANGLING IN MID AIR THAT IS NOT GROUNDED
The structure is supported by the ground
And stray charge would give random result not consistent attractive force
@BurDur Prove that ```any stray chrage would give a random result```
Lol free energy video in YouTube is believable