Electric lighting

@HockeyPockey zealotard

I can Google it. -DERP

@Citizen Z how do you explain the Cavendish results if gravitational nforce doesn't exist

HERPY DERP

Actually that’s a good question

@BurDur I've never seen a Cavendish experiment prove shit and ive seen about 100 of them

Nonsense

I usually see people tell why Cavendish is illegitimate, like the above

It shows the gravity force

No it doesn't

But what is the actual FE position on what Cavendish “means”?

You can repeat it

doesn't prove anything

Fine then fecore test proves nothing

Same logic

huge lead balls are wire spinning... proves nothing

I can write things off just like you

Dum

Which Cavendish experiment can you provide that eliminates all variables? @BurDur

Doesn’t prove anything isn’t really a position.

The first one did

And Paul Heyl and all the others since then

Like, what do you think caused the results?

I guess that’s better wording

Cavendish was not a true experiment.

Sure it was

So, wind? Electricity?

🤔

Cavendish was an awesome experiment

Followed scientific method

!mute @HockeyPockey

HockeyPockey#3209 (553102909957472277) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

Kek

>>voicekick @HockeyPockey

`!voicekick` Perhaps?

This isn’t fair

!voicekick @HockeyPockey

Or does Vortex do the kicking?

🤔

He shouldn’t be banned