@The Marlena Effect ✅ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ are you a pilot?

@The Marlena Effect ✅ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ you claim to be a pilot but I think you're lying

@Derek Nelson yet the horizon is below eye level

@Seeker of Truth how is that laser test proof of a flat Earth?

Jesus it was over a short distance with tons of sources of error

@Citizen Z that's just talking about how the data from the satellite was merged

We have photographed the Earth from up high, first in 1947

@Citizen Z nice, those magnets defy gravity

We go around the sun

Kepler's proved it mathematically

@Citizen Z how do you explain the Cavendish results if gravitational nforce doesn't exist

Nonsense

It shows the gravity force

You can repeat it

Fine then fecore test proves nothing

Same logic

I can write things off just like you

Dum

The first one did

And Paul Heyl and all the others since then

Sure it was

Cavendish was an awesome experiment

Followed scientific method

@Human Sheeple oh stop your cut and paste QE. The independent variable was the mass and distance, which caused a change in torque on the torsion balance

Null hypothesis is no correlation to mass and change in torque

Easy stuff

@Human Sheeple easy it was grounded uniform charge throughout

The structure is supported by the ground

And stray charge would give random result not consistent attractive force

Lol free energy video in YouTube is believable

But Livestream from space is fake

Coulomb force can be both repulsive and attractive depending on the charge

That's not a Cavendish experiment

Looool

Ok so if I set up a laser shooting at the sky and say see, it's not flat, is that the same as the fecore experiment?

Fake cgi

Lol don't pretend you understand that math

Gravity is all peer reviewed science too

Uncertainty of .15%

In the gravitational constant

U debunked yourself

@Human Sheeple oh ok cool so refraction is a thing

Explains the fecore laser thing then

Fake cgi

No u

Oh nice I can post a doc about Cavendish

And you'd believe it

Wow you did more research than me

Ya see it's been repeated so many times

@Human Sheeple nonsense

Uncertainty is .15%

@Human Sheeple lol they did all that, you just don't know how. Read their papers

Uncertainty is NOT 5 orders of magnitude dumass

Dunno about that, you can have charge but as long as it's accounted for you can deal with it. Or if it's the same throughout

Besides, those results are used in orbital mechanics. If it was wrong the orbit would be wrong

@Human Sheeple your logic about gravity can be used to dismiss electric force too

Because the milikan experiment is the charge force balanced against gravitational force

Doofus

@Human Sheeple why do all objects denser than air fall at the same rate

But when they're lighter than air the rate of rise is proportional to the density dofference

@Human Sheeple gravity has been directly measured so you're wrong. The only argument you have now is one from incredulity, so game over for you

Satellites around earth

Nice gif compression artifact

Ya gonna need source on a deep fried gif

@Human Sheeple lol thats bullshit, you can see satellites yourself

@Human Sheeple so what about hadfield in the ISS, shows he's in free fall for a long time

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 eh it's been proven by spaceflight, and measurements.

Eratosthenes-style, and horizon drop with altitude, and the entirety of geodesy

These measurements are the basis of our maps

So if you call into question that istory, you have a lot of explain in to do

24/7 is full of trah mods

It's verifiable bybus

Any shadow angles relative to vertical

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 the results he got are impossible on a flat plane with a local sun

Yeah with math. It's easy @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Here is how

The angle of shadows as a function of distance from the equator on a flat plane would be tan(d/h)

But on a globe it would be d/r.

Completely different angles would result.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 this is same math you use when building a deck, trig

I took a flat plane with local sun, and calculate d what I'd expect of the shadow angles

Sure but the math does

Dunno how you can say trigonometry is fake

Yes like analyze a situation

We did

With eratosthenes-style measurements

Here look @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EpiZnmY6CY&t=77s

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 I linked the experiment

Ya YouTube video

Proves radius of the earth

Ya I linked the experiment dumass

@Seeker of Truth it's been directly measured

Dunno why you think that

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 ok it's a measurement then

Still proves spherical earth

They measured the sahdows directly

Then used trig after that