im sorry but if someone doesn't believe in gravity they are lost

Hmm.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8qxe7z/this-microscope-can-see-down-to-individual-atoms

@Pc ~> Ps4 🔑 What kind of apology is that? 😡

they can drop an apple off a bridge and test the theory of gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSCX78-8-q0

so i believe in my right i am just with my wording

and i didnt slander them

Atoms under an electron microscope rearranged to say "star trek"

i said it once and never repeated it again

Yeah. I’m sorry but...

but?

Wtf. Don’t apologize if you don’t mean it. 😡

last time i was on here someone was slandering me so i dont get it

it seems so unjust

"So we can regularly see single atoms and atomic columns." That's because electron microscopes use a beam of electrons rather than photons, as you'd find in a regular light microscope. As electrons have a much shorter wavelength than photons, you can get much greater magnification and better resolution."

^^^

and sheeple abuses his powers he mutes everyone to speak over them

nit fair

So now we are using others behaviours to justify your own?

yes

Childish

thats how society works D

Gambino

Immature

okat slandering = ban so you deserve to now be banned

@Pc ~> Ps4 🔑 Grow up. 😡

@Send Pic of Main Hull Prove they are atoms and not just tiny ball bearings.

i am

!mute @Pc ~> Ps4 🔑

Oops, something went wrong in MEE6 land! <:SAD6:403540170629971968> This error has been reported to our Team. We'll work hard to fix it.

prove they arent by building your own

In the image shown above, the balls appear static. In the Star Trek one, the atoms can be seen moving around, not on a grid model.

The equipment is out there

i could also build my own, but you wouldnt trust it still

@Send Pic of Main Hull And that equipment has a limited resolution that just so happens coincidentally to be the same resolution as these "atoms" how convenient

And even if they are atoms, all you're seeing is the outer electron shell, if the electron even exists, which I highly doubt.

No, we alter the wavelength of the electrons to get the right resolution of the specific atom we are looking at

X-rays are much, much, smaller than photons

The model of the atom has changed over time, atom doesnt mean the current nuclear model it just means "component part"

Which could mean ball bearing then yes?