nit fair

So now we are using others behaviours to justify your own?

yes

Childish

thats how society works D

Gambino

Immature

okat slandering = ban so you deserve to now be banned

@Pc ~> Ps4 🔑 Grow up. 😡

@Send Pic of Main Hull Prove they are atoms and not just tiny ball bearings.

i am

!mute @Pc ~> Ps4 🔑

Oops, something went wrong in MEE6 land! <:SAD6:403540170629971968> This error has been reported to our Team. We'll work hard to fix it.

prove they arent by building your own

In the image shown above, the balls appear static. In the Star Trek one, the atoms can be seen moving around, not on a grid model.

The equipment is out there

i could also build my own, but you wouldnt trust it still

@Send Pic of Main Hull And that equipment has a limited resolution that just so happens coincidentally to be the same resolution as these "atoms" how convenient

And even if they are atoms, all you're seeing is the outer electron shell, if the electron even exists, which I highly doubt.

No, we alter the wavelength of the electrons to get the right resolution of the specific atom we are looking at

X-rays are much, much, smaller than photons

The model of the atom has changed over time, atom doesnt mean the current nuclear model it just means "component part"

Which could mean ball bearing then yes?

Alright you can use CRT tubes to image tiny ball bearings agreed.

if you want, atoms could be very extremely small ball bearings

many would question you, but you could

I've been muted again

somebody is salty 😔

What the heck is going on with venus

I did 😡

Why bro

Like ive said sheeple, if you dont trust me, and you dont trust the scientific community, the only way is to do it yourself

@bopratterglobes https://youtu.be/d4-1ASpdT1Y?t=43

lmao

i forgot about them

lolll

Lmao

@🌸Vyxen🌸 Dusruotive behaviour

pardon

My ears hurt 😡

Turn me down then?