https://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/928-flat-earth-fail-why-all-flat-earth-laser-experiments-beyond-the-land-water-horizon-are-inconclusive-and-worthless

https://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/928-flat-earth-fail-why-all-flat-earth-laser-experiments-beyond-the-land-water-horizon-are-inconclusive-and-worthless

https://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/928-flat-earth-fail-why-all-flat-earth-laser-experiments-beyond-the-land-water-horizon-are-inconclusive-and-worthless

http://optics.kulgun.net/Rays/

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8qxe7z/this-microscope-can-see-down-to-individual-atoms

Can someone unmute me?

K

Seeker of truth

I have a question

@Seeker of Truth

What makes the sun orbit in the flat earth model

?

Ive had this quesiton for a while

question

Yeah

what is fueling that perpetual motion?

in the first place of course

What gets the motion going in the first place

Or why is the sun a perpetual system @Seeker of Truth

So it isnt perpetual force?

its magnetic?

Ok so how is that magnet developed?

magnetic force

developed?

Because on the globe model we claim to have iron alloys in the core

Ok

Like a creato

creator

So @Seeker of Truth do you believe in an atmosphere?

im sorry i mean

space

So how do you exactly portray it?

Ok

And i have one last question

How would you explain relative density without an scientific explanation of what is down and what is up if you get what im saying

Like why doesnt the density allow the object to go upwards

instead of towards the ground

Gravity isnt real in the flat earth model

How so?

Actually lets just stick to the density topic

For now

then move on to that

Yes ik that

it is just a theory

I am asking about the flat earth model

What decides what direction an object goes according to its density

So would that be considered a theory?

Sorry im back

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ No you can not, and that is not the argument i am making, I am just saying the flat earth model relies of the theory that all things fall downward without any evidence as to why they fall downwards, just like the globe model, we have gravity, without any evidence that gravity exists

Yes, but we have no proof of that

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

Yes ik but you are missing the point

https://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/928-flat-earth-fail-why-all-flat-earth-laser-experiments-beyond-the-land-water-horizon-are-inconclusive-and-worthless

this is biased but has facts

@Seeker of Truth you never know if the photo is photoshopped, just like the NASA photos

@mOmO i think is the intellectual here

some pieces dont add up

Sometimes you have to imagine the pieces

Alot of things rely on theories in the flat earth model

and im not saying its not the same for the globe

Can you show evidence please?

And we need a whole review about every little thing about each model to make the conlcusion that more things are right on either one

you forget about all other aspects of teh atmosphere

temperature inversion
atmospheric ducting
atmospheric looming, sinking, towering & stooping
inferior mirage, superior mirage, and Fata Morgana
standard atmospheric refraction

just to name a few

Listen, you cant just throw videos and pictures supporting your claim without any sources and deny everything else

you are literally giving photos without sources

How do we know flat earthers are not editing the videos?

or someone else in that matte

matter

Ok so your gonna provide videos and photos with no sources what so ever, not reply to anything and leave?

Ok do what you want

You too

hope you see the truth

IKR

We show pictures of the round earth

they say its fake

and they show pictures of the flat earht

yeah

lmao

literally go up in teh chat

The moon landing actually has some evidence that it is fake

Like for example, the van allen belt is wayyy too radioactive for astronauts to go through

meme review is where its at

vaccines are good

anti vaxers are bad

wut is it

coolio

@Seeker of Truth Your acting like all these images of the earth were done by people who actually had better technology and a better understanding of the earth, when in reality, those images are just theories back then

@Seeker of Truth There is absolutely no proof that people back then were smarter than us now

They had less advanced technology than us if you didnt realise

Its not an opinion,its a fact, we had the same brains as we did years abck

*back

What are you talking about?

We literally uncovered bodies from thousands of years ago and can actually prove it

Yes you do

You realize the photo is enhanced

photographers always edit their videos

*pictures