@Based Fed

I heard this was the Ben Shapiro fan server?

how can I improve my arguments to destroy the Left with FACTS and LOGIC?

"muh scientific method"

you can buy a camera that takes pictures of jupiter

i dunno why this can even be debated

the church fathers tricked everyone into believing a round earth

>nobody here know who the church fathers were
>they claim to be Christians
Ouch.

@TheNikitis how come you never saw a sunrise or sunset?

"durr-hurr I never saw a sunrise before so earth falt derp-a-do"

@TheNikitis shifting goalposts

@TheNikitis yes you are. the absurdity of modern day ships existing twenty-thousand years ago has nothing to do with stone carving technique

@TheNikitis "advanced tech may have existed so ships existed too derp derp"

this is poe's law taken to an eleven

which flat earthers are trolls and which are true believers?

I'm still wondering why they're dodging the concept of sunrises or sunsets

because they never saw a sunrise @Buddha

oh shit I haven't, vee

fuck, no

hey is my mic working?

RIP

is my mic working?

@TheNikitis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Marble

https://nationalvanguard.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/real_hitler_quote.jpg

"Don't forget to like and subscribe." -Nikola Tesla

@Human Sheeple reddit, stahp

I mean I thought I saw the sun rise this mroning on my way to work but I guess NASHA's CGI department faked that too

@Human Sheeple after a meme that bad it's a good idea

@Human Sheeple lmao either you're the cringeiest LARPer ever or braindead. memes don't debunk the way we see the sun behave

@Human Sheeple hey you ever watch a movie you thought was bad because of the writing?

just curious, @Human Sheeple

@Human Sheeple no, I mean one that's not good in anyway. the writing just sucks

@Human Sheeple guess you haven't, oh well

oh no, not homophobes...

I can't say nehgger here?

I'm black, wtf?

I have n-word privileges it's okay for me to say n*gger

@Human Sheeple unmute, phaggot

thanks

is there an age restrion on this server? some people in VC sound like they're too young to be using the internet

I'd raise it to 18 but fair enough

@Soldz (CF) >18
>old

it's not prohibited by ToS...

where does it say "no n words"?

@Soldz (CF) so first you tell me you're following the ToS and right after I point out you're enforcing something that isn't there you bring up special rules for this server

@Soldz (CF) yeah re-read the conversation and saw that was in refrence to the age thing, fair enough

@April I'm aware servers can have their own rules, dude. If you paid attention earlier I had said I would make a rule barring anyone less than 18 from joining.

@April you must be young to have that opinion, or a pedo like @мιяαgє said

sure, but that was a really weird response @April

and...26? wtf you still think old folks tend to be dumber than younger people?

@April you don't get out much if you believe that

yes mental decay does occur...gradually

like, decades upon decades upon decades

meantime the brain is still an insane supercomputer and presuming the person doesn't have dementia or alzeimer's or some other brain disorder it'll have absorbed more knowledge and lived experience than a twenty-something child @April

right. so the tendency is younger people are stupider than older people

not the other way around

yes, that's exactly how that works

@topgyles you need lived experience for both

*"younger people are typically educated with up to date info while older people rely on what they were taught at that age"* no, that's not typical of younger people at all

in general, the information a younger person has access to is also available to an older person; meanwhile an older person has access to information only obtainable when the younger person was not yet born (or before they can remember), @April. there's no reason to presume the premise that younger people are more up to date on knowledge at all

@April I already established these are the tendencies, not absolutes. can a younger person be smarter than most old people? certainly possible. is this typical? not at all for all the reasons stated

@April these are ideologies, not smarts. liberals or conservatives can be dumber or smarter than one or the other

@April there's virtually no reason to believe that societies progress in some predestined fashion towards more progress

@April there's also no reason to believe progressive = smarter

@April most progressives, like most politically minded folk, take directly from whatever pundits spew without fact checking. they are neither "more accurate" nor "more freethinking"

@April actually it's pretty split as far as religious vs secular people in terms of brainpower

@April that's incorrect, as liberals will always cite the opinions of scientists (or sciency-sounding folk like Bill Nye), activists, social academics, and whoever else agree with them. they love authority when it suits them

@April functionally, what is the difference? they both espouse a worldview that puts liberties of the people first and foremost

Democrats aren't centrists unless we're defining "far left" strictly as hardcore communist/socialist/anarchist/radical-never-going-to-happen-opinion-here

and Hillary? conservative? lmao

@April Hillary supported gay rights, laxed borders, expanded government healthcare coverage, and her base was people who wanted a female president because wamans. there's no planet on which Hillary isn't a part of the left

@April Hillary ran on a platform to have LGBT as an officially protected class

how is that in opposition to gay rights, @April?

@April that is false, he did not run on that. while he was supportive of LGBT people (which, granted, is a liberal position) he did not run saying he'd do anything for them

@April 1) go re-read what I had said exactly about what Hillary ran on in regards to LGBT issues 2) Trump has liberal leanings; what a shocker. did you even pay attention to the 2016 election? ttyl

@April contrast with Ted Cruz who wanted to overturn the SCOTUS gay marriage ruling...

anarchists, I swear they live in a bubble

@April Yesterday at 8:36 PM
*"y'all still think "gay rights" means marriage"*

vazorium Yesterday at 8:32 PM
*"Hillary ran on a platform to have LGBT as an officially protected class"*

Thots, they can't follow a conversation. Also,

April Yesterday at 8:39 PM
*"worth noting leviticus is only for jews"*
1 Corinthians 6:9-11

literally says sodomites don't go to heaven

yes it does

that's literally the definition

@April .....that's spiciest and poorly researched. it's not what the bible means there

+setversion NAB

+versions

@April you're making my argument for me at this point. and no, it does not include sex of any kind since Jesus gave specific rules for marriage you idiot

@April that's not what he said, your knoweldge of the bible comes from reddit insetad of reading it

+setversion NASB

Mark 10:1-12

@April your understanding of the bible, that Jesus condemned all sex even in marriage, is retarded and wrong

@April >I read the bible
>I can't quote the bible accurately
>but, wait, the bible lies about jesus

Stop talking from ignorance, you don't know what you're talking about.

@April you've been proven wrong multiple times already when it comes to the bible

"sodomy isn't about gays" Corinthians 6:9-11

...

Corinthians 6:9-11

+setversion NASB

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

there we go. NASB is directly from the Greek; there's no arguing that you are incorrect in your interpretation of the verse, @April