Furthermore...

I know very little about moon landing conspiracy stuff

Let's get back to how arduous it'd be to attempt to re-create what was seen on tv in 1969 to tech that existed at the time.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth/

I doubt they are gonna listen

CCD camera and telescope on the DSCOVR satellite orbiting 1 million miles from Earth.

So?

RUSSIAN 30'S MOVIE FAKES ZERO-G: https://imgur.com/0HyEECO

No they didn't have the technology to fake it in the 60's because they already had it in the 30's 😂

@!GPT that's the best proof of sphere earth ever

not really

<:lul:484994724118134784> ..

kind of smashes all moon footge

250k miles earth isnt lining up

more incosistancies

all you have is bs

Wait, what part isn't lining up?

You’re gonna have to shoot on 35mm to minimize film grain.
Normal 35mm runs at 90 feet per minute, but since we’re shooting at 30 FPS that’ll be 112.5 feet per minute.
We need 47 min of original film, so that’s about 5300 feet of film. And there are no 35mm film magazines that hold 5300 feet. But I guess if you shoot 1000-foot loads, then you could do it in 5 mags. But… you don’t wanna see the splice marks when you put the reels together, cause then everyone would know it was a fake. Remember we’re shooting for TV so its 1:3:3 aspect ratio and not 1:8:5, which means you have to do A&B rolls. That’s where you cut the negative into A&B rolls and print them onto a 5300-foot fine grain interpositive, then cut an ‘Answer Print’ in the film lab. And then I guess make everyone who works in that lab disappear…
We’re still not done though, you still need to find a custom made really big Telecine that can transfer your 5300-foot answer print to video at 10 FPS. Pin registered of course. How hard can that be? Then I guess you have to be certain that in all of that splicing, printing, and transferring, none of the most common film articats have gotten onto your giant print. No emulsion flakes or base scratches, no gate weave, no film grain, and not one spec of dust… cause any one of those will instantly betray that it’s a hoax. Oh, and then do all of that for the other missions.

250k miles

right

Udo had a good point. At least consider it?

every photo of the moon air quotes

They wont even read that.

@!GPT that's easy, it's the focal length of the camera : https://www.google.ca/search?rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS707US707&biw=1920&bih=1058&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=g7bbW5-NB-mVjwTRibPYDQ&q=demo+of+camera+focal+length+foreground+background+gif&oq=demo+of+camera+focal+length+foreground+background+gif&gs_l=img.3...1482.2649.0.2729.6.5.1.0.0.0.181.353.0j2.2.0....0...1c.1.64.img..3.0.0....0.NxmnPfcvTZQ#imgrc=dMG5-tYMcjVoAM:

1 million miles

has there always been an art gallery

something isnt adding up

more nasa bs

It adds up

no

it doesnt

explain ballon moon rovers

that turn into a drivable solid

Focal length, as the above pointed out

Why do you spam pictures so much instead of giving a rebuttal to what he’s saying?

@!GPT

Yep focal length, easy, enxt?