16 min into the EVA they turn on the video camera. 4min later you get your “one small step for man”, then aldrin climbs out, they move the camera onto a tripod, and proceed to do all their moon walking, flag planting, photo snapping, and rock picking. Then Armstrong climbs back up into the lander and its over. By this time the camera has been running for over 143 minutes.

So if we’re faking this with electronic slowmo at 1/3rd speed, we only need to record 47 minutes of continuous live action video on disk.

750k miles from the moon

250k from earth

lmao

That’s a lot more than that Ampex Magnetic disk recorder could hold. Again, commercially available recorders could only hold 30 seconds of video

the top isn't even a real image

But for the sake of argument, NASA is special, maybe they have a really large one (in 1969). How much bigger? 96x bigger? They are NASA… maybe they have some super advanced high-speed electronics that no one knows about? But wait a minute, conspiracy theorists said the navigation computers were too slow so they couldn’t possibly have it both ways. Point being: Electronics are not good enough apparently to have a navigation computer that good, so they can’t have electronics good enough for an advanced high-speed camera capable of holding all that footage.

can i get unmuted now?

Ok.. so they can't do it with slomo high speed cameras cause it doesn't exist in that scale.

@Hugoboiii no

Lets say they try to do it with film.

why

flattie

In 1969 we already knew how to overcrank on film. For Apollo 11 you’d only need to shoot at 30 FPS and play it back at 10 FPS.

Tbh, that stuff is a bit over my head

Because your conversation is boring

So I wouldn't understand, but I see your point

Exactly, because conspiracy theorists know nothing about photography, or film, or cameras.

Furthermore...

I know very little about moon landing conspiracy stuff

Let's get back to how arduous it'd be to attempt to re-create what was seen on tv in 1969 to tech that existed at the time.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth/

I doubt they are gonna listen

CCD camera and telescope on the DSCOVR satellite orbiting 1 million miles from Earth.

So?

RUSSIAN 30'S MOVIE FAKES ZERO-G: https://imgur.com/0HyEECO

No they didn't have the technology to fake it in the 60's because they already had it in the 30's 😂

@!GPT that's the best proof of sphere earth ever

not really

<:lul:484994724118134784> ..

kind of smashes all moon footge

250k miles earth isnt lining up

more incosistancies

all you have is bs

Wait, what part isn't lining up?

You’re gonna have to shoot on 35mm to minimize film grain.
Normal 35mm runs at 90 feet per minute, but since we’re shooting at 30 FPS that’ll be 112.5 feet per minute.
We need 47 min of original film, so that’s about 5300 feet of film. And there are no 35mm film magazines that hold 5300 feet. But I guess if you shoot 1000-foot loads, then you could do it in 5 mags. But… you don’t wanna see the splice marks when you put the reels together, cause then everyone would know it was a fake. Remember we’re shooting for TV so its 1:3:3 aspect ratio and not 1:8:5, which means you have to do A&B rolls. That’s where you cut the negative into A&B rolls and print them onto a 5300-foot fine grain interpositive, then cut an ‘Answer Print’ in the film lab. And then I guess make everyone who works in that lab disappear…
We’re still not done though, you still need to find a custom made really big Telecine that can transfer your 5300-foot answer print to video at 10 FPS. Pin registered of course. How hard can that be? Then I guess you have to be certain that in all of that splicing, printing, and transferring, none of the most common film articats have gotten onto your giant print. No emulsion flakes or base scratches, no gate weave, no film grain, and not one spec of dust… cause any one of those will instantly betray that it’s a hoax. Oh, and then do all of that for the other missions.