What is?

I don't think the government needs to be involved to make flat earthers look ridiculous.

Spam more videos

The first one you posted is 52:46 long. Do you want me to stop watching this one and watch the 2nd video? or the 3rd?

Paragraphs. Try them.

Sources?

Other than *it's all bs*

No, you're supposed to provide proof to your claims.

That's how it works.

@Whistler fat chance. all he does is spam videos.

What an entertaining server.

So glad I joined to watch this.

Just make it so people have to phone verify. problem solved.

@Your New Leader! just ignore him.

Dude is insane.

You can't fall into an idiotic argument with some of these people. It's a waste of time.

Ok.

So what?

Keep posting the same videos over andover.

Ok.

So what?

I don't even care, it was how many years ago? How come you're not up in arms about new shite?

Hack conspiracy theorist talking about stuff from 2001.

yawn.

You're a sad person with seemingly no life. Seeker, and Sheeple.

Yes, these people need to be told to stop spamming.

Same nonsense every day.

Guy has posted the same video and image multiple times.

Never goes into detail or clarification on anything.

Just says "do your own research"

I've lurked for a while before commenting.

Yeah, world isn't fair.

Sometimes people gotta be told.

Get over it.

Spamming 9/11 stuff without anything else. what's the point?

if we all said "ok i agree with you"

what next?

that's my pint.

lol.

Conspiracy theorist go-to #1: "Yeah, they're probably in on it... CIA ops..."

The funniest thing is when conspiracy theorists turn on eachother and start accusing eachother of being "in on it"

then they can't get out of their own loop

ie: whats happening with flat earthers right now

"Mark Seargant is obviously a cia operative"

keep not saying anything in your own words.

speaks volumes.

@Seeker of Truth is there a conspiracy theory you don't believe in?

Serious question.

They ignore you if you're rude to them. Like I was earlier.

They say it's just weight.

I think.

I've heard flat earthers try to explain it but I don't remember exactly.

How gravity isn't real etc.

We went to the moon.

It would have been technically impossible to fake what was seen on tv in 1969. From a technology stand point.

@Citizen Z you think the footage shown on tv wasn't real?

The pivotal claim for the Apollo hoax theory without which all falls apart, is that what we saw on tv was slow motion footage of astronauts running around in a film studio.

Because if it wasn’t slow motion, it couldn’t have happened on Earth, right

Anyone know anything about how slow motion is produced in film cameras?

There are two ways to make motion slow:
One is, you shoot it at normal speed, and play it back slow.
One is, you shoot it fast and play it back normal.
The second way is called ‘Overcranking’. It looks smoother and more realistic because you’re sampling natural motion at a higher frame rate. But that means they would’ve had to shoot it on film using high speed film cameras, right? Why

In 1969 there were no high-speed video cameras yet. Some people did have magnetic disk recorders that could capture normal speed video and play it back slow. They used it for sports replays; it could record up to 30 seconds. Play back at 10 fps and you got a whopping 90 seconds of slowmo. I say 10 FPS because that was the video framerate for Apollo 11

They had a Non-Interlaced Slow Scan TV camera specially made for them by Westing House. All the later missions were using regular NTSC video cameras running at 29,97 FPS. That would be 3x harder to fake

I'm getting there if you'd let me.

Or this guy can spam

Keep in mind when people today watch documentaries about the Apollo missions, they’re looking at the highlights. They’re looking at short clips cut together. Short clips are much easier to fake. But in July 1969, 600 million people were all staring at a continuous lunar telecast that went on for a long time.

16 min into the EVA they turn on the video camera. 4min later you get your “one small step for man”, then aldrin climbs out, they move the camera onto a tripod, and proceed to do all their moon walking, flag planting, photo snapping, and rock picking. Then Armstrong climbs back up into the lander and its over. By this time the camera has been running for over 143 minutes.

So if we’re faking this with electronic slowmo at 1/3rd speed, we only need to record 47 minutes of continuous live action video on disk.

That’s a lot more than that Ampex Magnetic disk recorder could hold. Again, commercially available recorders could only hold 30 seconds of video

But for the sake of argument, NASA is special, maybe they have a really large one (in 1969). How much bigger? 96x bigger? They are NASA… maybe they have some super advanced high-speed electronics that no one knows about? But wait a minute, conspiracy theorists said the navigation computers were too slow so they couldn’t possibly have it both ways. Point being: Electronics are not good enough apparently to have a navigation computer that good, so they can’t have electronics good enough for an advanced high-speed camera capable of holding all that footage.

Ok.. so they can't do it with slomo high speed cameras cause it doesn't exist in that scale.

Lets say they try to do it with film.

In 1969 we already knew how to overcrank on film. For Apollo 11 you’d only need to shoot at 30 FPS and play it back at 10 FPS.

Exactly, because conspiracy theorists know nothing about photography, or film, or cameras.

Furthermore...

Let's get back to how arduous it'd be to attempt to re-create what was seen on tv in 1969 to tech that existed at the time.

You’re gonna have to shoot on 35mm to minimize film grain.
Normal 35mm runs at 90 feet per minute, but since we’re shooting at 30 FPS that’ll be 112.5 feet per minute.
We need 47 min of original film, so that’s about 5300 feet of film. And there are no 35mm film magazines that hold 5300 feet. But I guess if you shoot 1000-foot loads, then you could do it in 5 mags. But… you don’t wanna see the splice marks when you put the reels together, cause then everyone would know it was a fake. Remember we’re shooting for TV so its 1:3:3 aspect ratio and not 1:8:5, which means you have to do A&B rolls. That’s where you cut the negative into A&B rolls and print them onto a 5300-foot fine grain interpositive, then cut an ‘Answer Print’ in the film lab. And then I guess make everyone who works in that lab disappear…
We’re still not done though, you still need to find a custom made really big Telecine that can transfer your 5300-foot answer print to video at 10 FPS. Pin registered of course. How hard can that be? Then I guess you have to be certain that in all of that splicing, printing, and transferring, none of the most common film articats have gotten onto your giant print. No emulsion flakes or base scratches, no gate weave, no film grain, and not one spec of dust… cause any one of those will instantly betray that it’s a hoax. Oh, and then do all of that for the other missions.

They wont even read that.

Good arguments... lol.

How am I trolling?

I was arguing that it was impossible in 1969 to fake the moon landing because film and video tech wasn't good enough to recreate what was seen on tv. I wrote it out in detail, the entire thing but, i just got flushed out with pic/video spam.

I have it all written out in a word doc, so i can paste the whole thing. just cause i assumed that would happen - the video/image spam.

Possibly. The problem is, if I'm being honest, the later you get in time, the more easily it would be to hoax whatever you want on film.

It's for the vc apparently. Was what was told to me yesterday.

I'm all set. But thanks.

I thought Jernisism proved globe by accident while trying to prove flat earth?

:p

lmao

@Research_Flat_Earth - not going to comment?

on my comment?

Figured.

What about the gyroscope?

The 20k Gyro that was gonna prove flat earth

If you don't like it it leave.

As they like to say here.

Except one is proven by science to be true. Oh and we've been to space and took pictures despite what flat earther's believe.

spamming pics and videos isn't going to change anything. Plus the fact that billions of people agree with globers.

No they're not.

/gg

They wanna say they're fake. i Say they're real. gg.