Idk my graphic standards are kinda low

I don't care a lot about graphics, especially on old stuff

I think MGS2 is a spectacular looking game

but on a new console, that shit is fugly

MGS2 is nothing special compared to MGS3

True

dude, MGS2 was magnificient for its time

shadows, reflexions

It was good for an early PS2 game

The thing is I think most PS2 games hold up today graphically

a lot of graphical details

http://data.whicdn.com/images/53632959/large.jpg !!!!

What the fuck

wtf

Art

no but seriously, even for late games on PS2, MGS2 is still freaking beautiful, especially the lightning, etc

MGS3 looks better, true, but MGS2 was more revolutionary graphicaly wise

http://ps2media.ign.com/media/previews/image/mgs2/mgs2_shadow.jpg

real time reflexions, directional shadows, etc

it was really well done for its time

I think it was able to do that since the areas were tiny

Those reflections are actually that old method of having another model of the character on the other side, while the floor texture is just a little transparent.

(not that it makes it any less spectacular)

RUINED IT

HOW DARE YOU

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I was messing with it the other week ago, making the floor / walls more transparent to make them shiny. xD

off course they had to use cheap methods @Sexy Zombie Roo

the PS2 had cheap hardware lol

still, the final product looks amazing for its time

doing such thing without using cheap tricks would require you to use raytracing

and you can forget about any realtime or 60 FPS, even with current highend hardware if you use that, even for low poly games like MGS2

it's like that old duke nukem reflection trick

the mirror is an invisible wall and behind it is a copy of the room and a duplicate of the player

STOP RUINNING THINGS

TF2>Overwatch

tf2 is dead

does anyone wanna buy me re7

thanks

Me too

no me