I simply stated fact taken from the Geneva convention's own inspections of the camps in which so many were killed and somehow they missed it

@Cobra Commander Brainwashed fucker rather be a history revisionist than blindly look at what the victors wrote without question

There was also no revisionism there I was stating fact that the Geneva inspectors found nothing up with the camps in 1941-1943

How about having relatives who were in one of the *death* camps, and living in the country and seeing one of these places up close? You're the brainwashed one if you think that the Nazis just never "intentionally mistreated" their prisoners. You fail to mention how the Nazis made a concerted effort to keep the existence of these camps a secret, and that the killings were increased nearer to the end of the war. Along with someone who worked for the World Jewish Congress, Gerhart Reigner, notifying the allies in 1942 that the Nazis were indeed planning on killing off people in these camps, nor was this man the first person to do so.

Why we're there piles of valuables taken from their prisoners? Why we're there piles of things including shoes, fake teeth, and prosthetic limbs?

The fact that *so many people* had friends and relatives lost in these camps and seen these atrocities first hand cannot be ignored.

*”holocaust isn’t real”* <:kek:538084230408830987>

Dumb and edgy (lol) like flat earthers, but much more evil

:game_die: 6 (1 - 6)

I mean inspectors did roam the camps

He is not wrong about that

And they didn’t write that much bad stuff in their reports

I believe that when the Red Cross visited one of the Ghettos in what used to be Czechoslovakia, the Nazis spent money to clean up the Ghetto for it to look good. Forgot where in Czechoslovakia it was

I think it was the one near Prague

Whether you think they're good or bad, the Nazis were the stereotype of German efficiency

Kek

Love them or hate them, Joseph Gobbles be spitting facts

Also, weirdly enough, Hitler did write many things stating that Britain shouldn't be part of the Reich but a close Anglo-Saxon ally of the Reich

Yea hitler wanted Britain on his side

But the brits were too stuck up and prideful to join

Also, when Hitler complimented Britain, he calls them English. Whenever he criticises them, he called them British

Not sure if that's to do with weird translation

Probably a mix of both

In Mein Kampf, he wrote that Britain would join Germany in an alliance due to their hatred of France

ew grmans

```In Mein Kampf, he wrote that Britain would join Germany in an alliance due to their hatred of France``` He was incorrect. Didn't want a French or German dominated continent.

The UK didn't want a strong continental Europe against them, so a divided Europe was preferable.

He also didn't predict the likes of Chamberlain or Churchill

Chamberlain was terrified of a continental war and made colossal mistakes as a result.

Churchill just loved war

Yep. Opposite of Chamberlain in that regard.

Chamberlain was a pussy

The 20th Century Theresa May

Wilt Chamberlain <:lol:583236542580129825> <:lol:583236542580129825>

<:lol:583236542580129825> <:lol:583236542580129825>

<:lol:583236542580129825>

I got into a debate once with communists who got triggered by me saying that Chamberlain was a bad prime minister. That was fun.

Chamberlain was a Tory though

Why would any Commie back him?

Regardless of whether or not Geneva inspectors were in the camps, you have to remember that the Nazis were proactive in covering these up from outside eyes, which is why the exterminations were only really made known to the outside world when Soviet and American forces stumbled on them during their push into Germany (despite leaders from America, Britain, and Poland namely knowing about this earlier). It's not as simple as "they didn't find much bad" because there was much more at play here.

It was odd. I figure it was because the USSR was still at peace with Hitler then.