@Katze Miaulitzer nazis were not anti-capitalist

it says here on the wiki

Not sure where you get that from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-capitalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nazism_and_Stalinism#Origins_of_totalitarianism

Yeah, proving my point cobra

:3

Not if you actually read it

because again these two entities share a ton of similarities

@Katze Miaulitzer quote that page and show me wherenit says that

It actively disagrees with your statement

"Nazi propaganda posters in working class districts emphasised anti-capitalism, such as one that said: "The maintenance of a rotten industrial system has nothing to do with nationalism. I can love Germany and hate capitalism"

"The Nazis argued that free market capitalism damages nations due to international finance and the worldwide economic dominance of disloyal big business,"

"Both in public and in private, Hitler expressed disdain for capitalism, arguing that it holds nations ransom in the interests of a parasitic cosmopolitan rentier class"

They’re arguing a pro isolationist stance

Yes, they’re talking about international banking

but they expressed that against free market capitalism in general

All of the top Nazi officials engaged in capitalist enterprises, and German business was inexorably intertwined with the Nazi party

"Joseph Goebbels, who would later go on to become the Nazi Propaganda Minister, was strongly opposed to both capitalism and communism, viewing them as the "two great pillars of materialism" that were "part of the international Jewish conspiracy for world domination."[267] Nevertheless, he wrote in his diary in 1925 that if he were forced to choose between them, "in the final analysis", "it would be better for us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under capitalism".[268] He also linked his anti-Semitism to his anti-capitalism, stating in a 1929 pamphlet that "we see, in the Hebrews, the incarnation of capitalism, the misuse of the nation's goods."[167] "

AHEM

@Cobra Commander I read that article and it says exactly what I said

Which is that they are both authoritarian

Where exactly are you referring to in the article?

Literally the entire article

Well yes they are both authoritarian

that's not what I was arguing

It goes through the similarities in authoritarianism

yes and according to the definition of fascism they are very similar as well

Ok, then please quote the part of the article that supports your position

"The SA regarded Hitler's seizure of power in 1933 as a "first revolution" against the left, and some voices within the ranks began arguing for a "second revolution" against the right."

@Katze Miaulitzer yes, so it was an anti-left movement

Notice they didn’t actually get around to the second part

it would help if you acknowledged what fascism is.

They just took over the government

I have already laid out the definition of fascism

also them not getting to that part doesn't mean that wasn't their intent

and I have as well

I categorically disagree with your characterization of fascism

...right it was a right wing populist movement

Weren't the communist fascists too then?

No