Those who use it to push their ideas or impose them is just disgusting and makes people less likely to take the topic seriously.

Guys,
If I would assume that climate change is a big deal and is the fault of all the people, than wouldn't it already be to late to save the earth? I mean when I see all the shit on Instagram like: "O my god, the world is gone within 5 years!!!", then it's just pointless to spend money and effort to save the earth, am I right?

btw, I don't think that its a big deal and it isn't caused by people (for the greatest part)

Just focus on what the scientists say - and by extension, what the science says

Which is?

In 1975 (-/+) scientists claimed there was a ice-cold climate ahead of us

Never true

I don't see any signs that point to that either

> In 1975 (-/+) scientists claimed there was a ice-cold climate ahead of us
> Never true
Source: https://youtu.be/XB3S0fnOr0M

@Dr.Cosby

1975 scientists when global warming was heavily debated vs current scientists where climate change (the now overall carbon emmissions effect on the world) are not the same scientists running off the same info

GG @E2D2, you just advanced to level 8!

They've adapted, grown, and developed their studies and have reached a point surrounding the enviornment

What are they saying now then? When will the earth be gone?

GG @luduma, you just advanced to level 1!

@luduma you can look up UN enviornmental reports or Google up enviornmental reports and see them yourself

You're talking about these reports? Well let me give you an example:
https://www.osce.org/eea/14851?download=true

Don't think it's true, do you?

thats about environmental refugees, not about the state of the environment

try again

well, what's the reason for those refugees then, if it isn't "the state of the environment"?

@E2D2

and my point was that those reports aren't reliable

thats an example

so try again * uses uno reverse card *

I said you can look up environmental reports on how scientist discuss the effects of carbon emissions on the environment and you pulled a completely different topic out of nowhere.

Also, people become refugees for more than just the environment. I hope you know that

youre just avoiding my point rn

I am not

How are they unreliable then since that is your claim

have there been 50 million refugees because of climate yet?

over the entire span of history or recently? I could say there could have been

no since 2005

between droughts, floods, and other changes to communities that make it hard for people to live there perhaps

-_-

GG @luduma, you just advanced to level 2!

the climate has been changing since the world existed and will change until the world dies (not because of climate change 🙂)

oh damn, who knew. So since even you know that the climate has been changing you recognize that it is trending towards more extreme weather that we have not seen before right? And that mankind has a hand in how the earth is changing as well right?

like, no shit climate changes but since industrialization there have been increasing changes

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php
Tell me, what is the first sentence?
`Climate change may not be responsible for the recent skyrocketing cost of natural disasters, but it is very likely that it will impact future catastrophes`

**Published Mar 30, 2005**

*This page contains archived content and is no longer being updated. At the time of publication, it represented the best available science.*

literally above the first sentence