Message from @luduma
Discord ID: 660184520019935235
Gotta love how a democrat said "Logical Reasoning"
quality comeback
lol, why
You really can't deny that climate change or global warming is not affected by human activity, especially when the worlds top leading scientists have concluded this on their own as a group
It's not so much whether climate change is happening, it's the fact that it's being used as a tool to accomplish other goals related to the structuring of society or to fight perceived injustices by leftist activist type people
most people accept that climate change is occurring
there are some who are skeptical of the level of our involvement in it, as well as what steps we need to take to mitigate it
Those who use it to push their ideas or impose them is just disgusting and makes people less likely to take the topic seriously.
Guys,
If I would assume that climate change is a big deal and is the fault of all the people, than wouldn't it already be to late to save the earth? I mean when I see all the shit on Instagram like: "O my god, the world is gone within 5 years!!!", then it's just pointless to spend money and effort to save the earth, am I right?
btw, I don't think that its a big deal and it isn't caused by people (for the greatest part)
Just focus on what the scientists say - and by extension, what the science says
Which is?
In 1975 (-/+) scientists claimed there was a ice-cold climate ahead of us
Never true
I don't see any signs that point to that either
> In 1975 (-/+) scientists claimed there was a ice-cold climate ahead of us
> Never true
Source: https://youtu.be/XB3S0fnOr0M
1975 scientists when global warming was heavily debated vs current scientists where climate change (the now overall carbon emmissions effect on the world) are not the same scientists running off the same info
They've adapted, grown, and developed their studies and have reached a point surrounding the enviornment
@luduma you can look up UN enviornmental reports or Google up enviornmental reports and see them yourself
You're talking about these reports? Well let me give you an example:
https://www.osce.org/eea/14851?download=true
Don't think it's true, do you?
thats about environmental refugees, not about the state of the environment
try again
well, what's the reason for those refugees then, if it isn't "the state of the environment"?
and my point was that those reports aren't reliable
thats an example
so try again * uses uno reverse card *
I said you can look up environmental reports on how scientist discuss the effects of carbon emissions on the environment and you pulled a completely different topic out of nowhere.
Also, people become refugees for more than just the environment. I hope you know that
youre just avoiding my point rn
I am not
How are they unreliable then since that is your claim
have there been 50 million refugees because of climate yet?
over the entire span of history or recently? I could say there could have been
no since 2005
between droughts, floods, and other changes to communities that make it hard for people to live there perhaps
-_-