Message from @luduma

Discord ID: 660213123202154498


2019-12-27 19:57:24 UTC  

was a question (sorry, i forgot the: "If that was true")

2019-12-27 19:57:29 UTC  

But anyway

2019-12-27 19:57:30 UTC  

my question is: How much percent do people affect the climate?

2019-12-27 19:57:57 UTC  

I believe you are asking "What percentage of the climate is affected by people?"

2019-12-27 19:58:09 UTC  

yes, im dutch 😬

2019-12-27 19:59:04 UTC  

I cannot provide a definitive answer as I am not an environmental scientist, but that is still a massively disputed question. You can look it up yourself

2019-12-27 19:59:33 UTC  

hm, that's like the only important thing to me

2019-12-27 19:59:45 UTC  

and online it says a lot of things

2019-12-27 19:59:50 UTC  

which is true?

2019-12-27 19:59:50 UTC  

then you can look up

2019-12-27 20:00:06 UTC  

how do i know if its fake or not?

2019-12-27 20:00:08 UTC  

and go off of trusted sources and look into what kind of study they conducted

2019-12-27 20:00:41 UTC  

i will certainly do

2019-12-27 20:05:30 UTC  

Found this Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_temperature_record
If you scroll down you can see that the climate has been a lot higher and a lot lower in the (long) past

2019-12-27 20:07:21 UTC  

could you find an article that isn't wikipedia? Like don't your teachers tell you its not a valid source?

2019-12-27 20:07:35 UTC  

and why's that

2019-12-27 20:07:35 UTC  

GG @luduma, you just advanced to level 4!

2019-12-27 20:09:01 UTC  

because wikipedia isn't an actual source, its a webpage written by anyone on the web, and can be changed by almost anyone on the internet. Its not a study or research but essentially a summary of other sources

2019-12-27 20:09:01 UTC  

GG @E2D2, you just advanced to level 9!

2019-12-27 20:10:31 UTC  

> because wikipedia isn't an actual source, its a webpage written by anyone on the web, and can be changed by almost anyone on the internet. Its not a study or research but essentially a summary of other sources
Including NASA

2019-12-27 20:11:14 UTC  

but okay, ill find another one

2019-12-27 20:11:35 UTC  

dude

2019-12-27 20:11:51 UTC  

NASA actually conducts studies. Wikipedia is does not

2019-12-27 20:12:15 UTC  

school teachers teach that

2019-12-27 20:12:43 UTC  

wikipedia refers to it

2019-12-27 20:13:01 UTC  

you can't just completely ignore it because its Wikipedia

2019-12-27 20:13:52 UTC  

I am saying you should find an actual study, not a summary, which Wikipedia is. Wiki is not where you should go to find scientific studies, their purpose, etc.

2019-12-27 20:14:06 UTC  

A first hand source is what you should be looking for, which Wiki isn't

2019-12-27 20:14:36 UTC  

sure

2019-12-27 20:14:40 UTC  

will search

2019-12-27 20:32:32 UTC  

I think this says enough @E2D2

2019-12-27 20:44:40 UTC  

Exactly @amicuma, its an natural cycle that has always been a thing

2019-12-27 21:21:32 UTC  

A 2014 article by The Royal Search

2019-12-27 21:21:34 UTC  

sure

2019-12-27 21:23:43 UTC  

that is all I will ever use in the debates about climate change with others

2019-12-27 21:32:51 UTC  

Does it matter that it is an article from 2014?

2019-12-27 21:33:00 UTC  

And from the royal search

2019-12-27 21:33:06 UTC  

No it obviously doesn’t

2019-12-27 21:59:50 UTC  

Compare that to the other sources listed in the arguments above it doesn't look to have as much depth

2019-12-28 01:15:02 UTC  

The earth can only radiate away so much waste heat. There are also two countervailing trends in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gas build up which locks in waste heat in a longrun fashion and global dimming, which is the result of other gases decreasing the amount of solar energy in