they have always lived there

now there is a decrease in ice

and increase in polar bears

Like I said, they have been moving further south in search for food for example. Polar bears have always moved between the arctic circle and tundra areas depending on the seasons in the northern hemisphere. They can still grow in population, its their food source that is shifting that is the concern with the polar bear pop. If your vision on climate change is focused on the increasing amount of polar bears there are, you might want to also look at the displacement of their main food sources rather than just the number of polar bears that exist.

but why are they moving because of food? why is there more food there?

my vision of climate change isnt focused on the polar bears amount

Polar bears move *in search of food*

> why is there more food there?

yes that is what *you* said

Im not saying every polar bear that moves finds the exact source of food they need or are getting their dietary requirements. For all I know they could be travelling south and eating whatever meat they find in those areas.

never said that 😂

quote me

but why are they moving because of food? why is there more food there?

thats your statement

> Like I said, they have been moving further south in search for food for example.
That's your statement, which i was referring to

ok? I still quoted your statement.

wasnt a statement

was a question (sorry, i forgot the: "If that was true")

But anyway

my question is: How much percent do people affect the climate?

I believe you are asking "What percentage of the climate is affected by people?"

yes, im dutch 😬

I cannot provide a definitive answer as I am not an environmental scientist, but that is still a massively disputed question. You can look it up yourself

hm, that's like the only important thing to me

and online it says a lot of things

which is true?

then you can look up

how do i know if its fake or not?

and go off of trusted sources and look into what kind of study they conducted

i will certainly do

Found this Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_temperature_record
If you scroll down you can see that the climate has been a lot higher and a lot lower in the (long) past

could you find an article that isn't wikipedia? Like don't your teachers tell you its not a valid source?

and why's that

GG @luduma, you just advanced to level 4!

because wikipedia isn't an actual source, its a webpage written by anyone on the web, and can be changed by almost anyone on the internet. Its not a study or research but essentially a summary of other sources

GG @E2D2, you just advanced to level 9!

> because wikipedia isn't an actual source, its a webpage written by anyone on the web, and can be changed by almost anyone on the internet. Its not a study or research but essentially a summary of other sources
Including NASA

but okay, ill find another one

dude

NASA actually conducts studies. Wikipedia is does not

school teachers teach that